From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yong.zhang0@gmail.com (Yong Zhang) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:12:41 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 53/57] sound: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED In-Reply-To: References: <1316597339-29861-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1316597339-29861-54-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20110921121241.GC2550@zhy> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:55:36AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:28:54 +0800, > > Yong Zhang wrote: > > > > > > Since commit [c58543c8: genirq: Run irq handlers with interrupts disabled], > > > > Hm, this id hits a different commit: > > commit c58543c869606532c2382f027d6466f4672ea756 > > Author: David S. Miller > > Date: Tue Oct 13 00:49:09 2009 -0700 > > > > sparc64: Set IRQF_DISABLED on LDC channel IRQs. > > > > You mean commit e58aa3d2d0cc01ad8d6f7f640a0670433f794922? > > Yeah. > > > > We run all interrupt handlers with interrupts disabled > > > and we even check and yell when an interrupt handler > > > returns with interrupts enabled (see commit [b738a50a: > > > genirq: Warn when handler enables interrupts]). > > > > > > So now this flag is a NOOP and can be removed. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang > > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > > > > Do you want to merge by yourself or shall I take it to sound git tree? > > Since IRQF_DISABLED isn't used, it can be applied safely in 3.1-based > > tree, right? > > Yes, please go ahead. I'll pick up the leftovers. Takashi, if you take it, could you please modify that commit id to the right one? Otherwise I could change it when I refresh this patchset. Thanks, Yong