From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:53:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110923225309.GA6324@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d3et4zj9.fsf@ti.com>
Arnd,
* Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> [110921 09:09]:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
>
> > On Tuesday 20 September 2011 23:46:11 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> It seems that you replace the #ifdef in the board-flash.c file
> >> with a similar #ifdef in the header that replaces this with an
> >> empty inline function when the object is not built.
> >
> > Found another similar problem over night, presumably in the voltage series:
> >
>
> Found. Patch below.
>
> If this one is OK, I'll push to my for_3.2/voltage-cleanup branch (which
> is already pulled into arm-soc/next/voltage) so just re-pulling will
> pick up the fix.
Arnd, care to pull this in directly from Kevin into voltage branch?
It's available at:
git://gitorious.org/khilman/linux-omap-pm for_3.2/voltage-cleanup
Regards,
Tony
> From 473dc975c3ea468049732155467ff08fe3701f98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:24:53 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: voltage layer present, even when CONFIG_PM=n
>
> Even when CONFIG_PM=n, we try to scale the boot voltage to a sane,
> known value using OPP table to find matching voltage based on boot
> frequency. This should be done, even when CONFIG_PM=n to avoid
> mis-configured bootloaders and/or boot voltage assumptions made by
> boot loaders.
>
> Also fixes various compile problems due to depenencies between voltage
> domain and powerdomain code (also present when CONFIG_PM=n).
>
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> ---
> Compile tested with CONFIG_PM=n
> Applies to arm-soc/next/voltage
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 2 --
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.h | 14 --------------
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
> index 8bd389d..5129785 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
> @@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += prcm.o cm2xxx_3xxx.o cminst44xx.o \
> vp44xx_data.o
>
> # OMAP voltage domains
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM),y)
> voltagedomain-common := voltage.o vc.o vp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += $(voltagedomain-common) \
> voltagedomains2xxx_data.o
> @@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += $(voltagedomain-common) \
> voltagedomains3xxx_data.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += $(voltagedomain-common) \
> voltagedomains44xx_data.o
> -endif
>
> # OMAP powerdomain framework
> powerdomain-common += powerdomain.o powerdomain-common.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.h
> index 4c09809..16a1b09 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.h
> @@ -148,25 +148,11 @@ void omap_voltage_get_volttable(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
> struct omap_volt_data **volt_data);
> struct omap_volt_data *omap_voltage_get_voltdata(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
> unsigned long volt);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> int omap_voltage_register_pmic(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
> struct omap_voltdm_pmic *pmic);
> void omap_change_voltscale_method(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
> int voltscale_method);
> int omap_voltage_late_init(void);
> -#else
> -static inline int omap_voltage_register_pmic(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
> - struct omap_voltdm_pmic *pmic)
> -{
> - return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -static inline void omap_change_voltscale_method(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
> - int voltscale_method) {}
> -static inline int omap_voltage_late_init(void)
> -{
> - return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -#endif
>
> extern void omap2xxx_voltagedomains_init(void);
> extern void omap3xxx_voltagedomains_init(void);
> --
> 1.7.6
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-23 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-17 1:46 [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window Tony Lindgren
2011-09-20 20:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-20 20:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-20 21:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-20 21:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-20 22:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 7:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-22 0:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-21 13:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-21 16:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-22 14:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-22 16:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-23 22:53 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-09-30 20:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-20 23:25 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix missing inline functions for Makefile cleanup (Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window) Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110923225309.GA6324@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).