From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: I-cache/D-cache inconsistency issue with page cache
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:47:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110924094734.GC17169@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110924093544.GA5724@glandium.org>
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:35:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 08:39:41PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:57:21PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > We've been hitting random crashes at startup with Firefox on tegras
> > > (under Android), and narrowed it down to a I-cache/D-cache
> > > inconsistency. A reduced testcase of the issue looks like the following
> > > (compile as ARM, not Thumb):
> >
> > If you write code at run time, you need to use the sys_cacheflush
> > API to ensure that it's properly synchronized with the I-cache. It's
> > a well known issue, and it applies to any harvard cache structured
> > CPU which doesn't automatically ensure coherence (which essentially
> > means all ARMs.)
>
> I do agree it's reasonable to have applications doing that to handle
> cache synchronization themselves. I wrote such in my message. But I
> think the kernel should make sure that its page cache is fresh when
> it maps it PROT_EXEC. I think it's unreasonable to expect applications
> doing mmap(PROT_WRITE), inflate, munmap, something, mmap(PROT_EXEC),
> and execute something there to have to handle cache synchronisation
> themselves. Especially when it's very CPU dependent (the testcase does
> not even fail on all ARMs, only tegras, apparently). I'm not talking
> actual code generation here, which needs platform-dependent behaviour.
Ok. Which kernel are you trying this with, and which CPU (please
confirm Cortex-A9)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-24 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-23 11:57 I-cache/D-cache inconsistency issue with page cache Mike Hommey
2011-09-23 19:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-24 9:35 ` Mike Hommey
2011-09-24 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-09-24 10:07 ` Mike Hommey
2011-09-24 10:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-25 9:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-09-25 10:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-25 15:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-09-25 19:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-24 10:14 ` Siarhei Siamashka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110924094734.GC17169@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).