From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Pull request: removal of most instances of mach/memory.h
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:29:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110926232943.GD23680@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1109261901550.2718@xanadu.home>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 07:03:12PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:10:03PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This also gives additional merge conflicts elsewhere, and while git
> > > > > rerere makes some of them easy, the quantity is going to be a right
> > > > > pain to deal with on a repeated basis.
> > > >
> > > > Again, I'm perfectly willing to use a different base for this series and
> > > > fix the conflicts myself if you give me one.
> > >
> > > Nevermind, I see that you merged it anyway.
> > >
> > > You may consider the rerere.autoupdate config option if you want Git to
> > > automatically pick the conflict resolution without you manually
> > > confirming them all the time.
> >
> > rerere doesn't deal with modified/deleted conflicts though.
>
> True. That can be considered a limitation worth fixing.
Well. Now I'm not impressed, having investigated the reason behind
some of these conflicts.
The reason I'm getting the modify/delete conflict is because you've
made the same change to arch/arm/mach-prima2/include/mach/memory.h
as the one which you already submitted to me.
commit e922fe6625fb4700f041e5984ba6c09a1cadae65
Author: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Wed Sep 21 20:52:40 2011 +0100
Commit: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
CommitDate: Mon Sep 26 12:31:09 2011 +0100
ARM: 7093/1: mach-prima2: move ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size
The branch that contained the ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE removal missed prima2.
Original comment:
Restrict DMA-able region to workaround silicon limitation.
The limitation restricts buffers available for DMA to SD/MMC
hardware to be below 256MB.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
vs
commit 98b0124f0e2b88ec74cbd9345cf6195e527ce251
Author: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Fri Sep 2 21:05:10 2011 -0400
Commit: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
CommitDate: Tue Sep 6 17:25:54 2011 -0400
ARM: mach-prima2: move ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size
Original comment:
Restrict DMA-able region to workaround silicon limitation.
The limitation restricts buffers available for DMA to SD/MMC
hardware to be below 256MB.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
I've no idea why you submitted this change to me if you'd already merged
it into your own tree - this is total madness and is just making more
work for me with no reason.
A little more discipline and communication (such as asking me to drop
the duplicate commit _first_) would be nice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-26 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-07 3:13 Pull request: removal of most instances of mach/memory.h Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-13 12:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-20 17:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 13:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-26 13:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 14:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 19:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-26 20:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 20:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 22:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-26 23:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 23:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-09-27 0:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-27 0:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-27 7:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-27 12:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 22:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-26 23:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-26 23:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-26 23:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-10-04 18:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-10-17 0:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110926232943.GD23680@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox