linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:00:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110929110011.GL3697@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110928231410.GF2838@ponder.secretlab.ca>

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:14:10PM -0500, Grant Likely wrote:

> For your question, I still think it is the driver that gets to make
> the decision.  If it can proceed without a resource, then it should go
> ahead and succeed on the probe, and then arrange to either be notified
> of new gpio controller (or whatever) registrations, or poll for the
> resource to be set up.

Right, I do tend to agree.  This is something we'll have to bear in mind
when deploying this stuff - drivers that are doing this sort of stuff
are going to get surprised.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-29 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-22 18:51 [RFC PATCH v3] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism Grant Likely
2011-09-22 18:58 ` Joe Perches
2011-09-22 20:29 ` Alan Cox
2011-09-22 21:19   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 17:50     ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2011-09-23 23:18       ` Grant Likely
     [not found]   ` <4E7BA661.7070903@cavium.com>
2011-09-22 22:47     ` Alan Cox
2011-09-23  5:02       ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 16:55       ` David Daney
2011-09-26 14:16 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-26 15:12   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-26 15:26     ` Mark Brown
2011-09-26 15:48       ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 13:50         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-27 21:08           ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 22:13             ` Mark Brown
2011-09-28 13:04               ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-28 13:20                 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-28 23:14               ` Grant Likely
2011-09-29 11:00                 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-10-03 23:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-10-04 15:52   ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 14:51 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-04 15:58   ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 18:35     ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-04 23:35       ` Grant Likely
2011-10-07  3:31         ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-10-11 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]   ` <4E94B01D.2050402@cavium.com>
2011-10-13  4:19     ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110929110011.GL3697@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).