From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:54:02 +0100
Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-2 for v3.2
In-Reply-To: <019201cc8293$7776a790$6663f6b0$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <002001cc80e5$3e497790$badc66b0$%kim@samsung.com>
	<20111002192950.GB1005@sirena.org.uk>
	<019201cc8293$7776a790$6663f6b0$%kim@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <20111005165401.GA7155@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:45:16PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:

> Could you please test on Cragganmore board again only with my for-next-test
> branch?

I tried this, same result as -next.  v3.1-rc8 works fine.  I also tried
a bisect which was a bit of a nightmare due to soc_is_ and S5P_VA_GPIOn
not being defined in the GPIO code and other places in a lot of
revisions so I didn't finish it, perhaps later.