From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:59:46 -0700
Subject: ARM SoC tree: OMAP PM dependency on tip irq/core
In-Reply-To: <4E877E29.7000309@gmail.com>
References: <87aa9mm8ts.fsf@ti.com> <87k48pfyvg.fsf@ti.com>
	<4E877E29.7000309@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111006195945.GQ6324@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> [111001 13:21]:
> On 09/30/2011 05:29 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:
> > 
> >> The upcoming OMAP4 PM series from Santosh[1] that we're planning to
> >> queue for v3.2 has a dependency[2] on a patch currently queued for v3.2
> >> in the irq/core branch of Thomas' tip tree[3].
> >>
> >> In the past, I noticed you merged external trees like this to solve
> >> dependencies.
> >>
> >> Could you pull the irq/core branch into your tree to meet this
> >> dependency?
> > 
> > On second thought, since Santosh's branch is the only one with this
> > dependency (and we also have a dependency on Russell's devel-stable)
> > I'll just build up a branch for Santosh's series that includes
> > rmk/devel-stable and tglx/irq-core.
> > 
> 
> Any new platforms will have a dependency on rmk/devel-stable with the
> mach header clean-up. I'll probably have a dependency on tglx's tree as
> well.

Sounds like Arnd should pull this into some branch then.

Tony