linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] omap: dmtimer: convert printk to pr_err
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:22:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111007092243.GC27281@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317977417-17874-1-git-send-email-vjaquez@igalia.com>

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:50:16AM +0200, V?ctor Manuel J?quez Leal wrote:
> Convert a printk(KERN_ERR) message in the driver to pr_err().
...
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void omap_dm_timer_wait_for_reset(struct omap_dm_timer *timer)
>  	while (!(__raw_readl(timer->sys_stat) & 1)) {
>  		c++;
>  		if (c > 100000) {
> -			printk(KERN_ERR "Timer failed to reset\n");
> +			pr_err("Timer failed to reset\n");

What is the reason behind this change?  It looks like it's to use the
latest and greatest function.

If so, please don't make these changes - we have on many occasions been
blamed for size of diffstat, churn, needless change, and this patch is
exactly that.

By all means fix printk's without KERN_ constants, possibly converting
them to pr_*, but don't go around replacing printk(KERN_* with pr_*(
without ensuring that there's a real benefit to the change.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-07  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-06 10:48 [PATCH] omap: dmtimer: convert printk to pr_* Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal
2011-10-06 15:19 ` Joe Perches
2011-10-06 16:26   ` Víctor M. Jáquez L.
2011-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v2] omap: dmtimer: convert printk to pr_err / WARN Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal
2011-10-06 20:18   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-10-07  8:50     ` [PATCH v3] omap: dmtimer: convert printk to pr_err Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal
2011-10-07  9:22       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-10-07 10:46         ` Víctor M. Jáquez L.
2011-10-07 17:40         ` Joe Perches
2011-10-07 19:18           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-07 19:48             ` Joe Perches
2011-10-07 19:57               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-07 20:02                 ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111007092243.GC27281@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).