From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawn.guo@freescale.com (Shawn Guo)
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:52:43 +0800
Subject: [GIT PULL] DEBUG_LL platform updates for 3.2
In-Reply-To: <20111010133246.GG2451@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <20110928103815.GA8344@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<201110072251.40028.arnd@arndb.de>
	<20111010103635.GA2451@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
	<201110101320.24457.arnd@arndb.de>
	<20111010133246.GG2451@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <20111011075241.GA25696@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:32:46PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:20:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 10 October 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Do you have any other ideas?
> > 
> > I think the best solution would be to ask Russell to put all the dependencies
> > into a non-rebasing branch and publish that, or to alternatively merge your
> > patches through his tree instead, with my Ack.
> 
> I don't think asking Russell to maintain a stable branch for each series
> scales very well if multiple people are doing cross-platform work at the
> same time. If he's happy merging platform code via his tree, then I'd prefer
> to go down that route. In this case, it might make sense to try and catch
> conflicts between his tree and arm-soc before they hit Linus (I guess -next
> will take care of this?).
> 
> > Both of these will also have to wait for a few more days until Russell
> > is back online.
> 
> Ok, I wasn't aware that we was away.
> 
> > Can you check if the devel-stable branch in his tree already contains the
> > dependencies?
> 
> I just had a quick look and I can't seem them outside of the unstable for-next
> branch.
> 
I also have a number of patches that imx6q series depends on only
showing on rmk's for-next branch, and I have to hold imx6q pull request
until these patches show up on some non-rebased tree. 

-- 
Regards,
Shawn