From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [ARM] mach-types: Re-add apf9328
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:06:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111013090609.GT577@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111008220722.GG25689@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 09:26:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:19:48PM +0200, Gwenhael Goavec-Merou wrote:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gwenhael Goavec-Merou <gwenhael.goavec-merou@armadeus.com>
> >
> > I think this file is maintained by Russell, yet I want to ack that the entry
> > below is missing for building mx1_defconfig. Found that, too.
>
> The thing is - read the comments at the top of the file. There's hints
> there as to what will happen if you patch the file. The hint is
> 'automatically generated'. So when I next update the file, any patches
> done to the file will be wiped out.
Currently the id is still missing in your for-next branch and it is
marked as "mainlined" on http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/
(906).
That means that the next update should include the id, right? Maybe it's
worth to add it already earlier with the patch Gwenhael proposed as
without it mx1_defconfig is broken. After f32609c5a035 it even breaks
imx_v4_v5_defconfig.
BTW is there a way to see the mach-types file as it would land in
linux.git if it were updated now?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-13 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-08 15:19 [PATCH 1/2] [ARM] mach-types: Re-add apf9328 Gwenhael Goavec-Merou
2011-10-08 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] [ARM] MX1:apf9328: Add i2c support Gwenhael Goavec-Merou
2011-10-08 19:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-10-11 15:26 ` gwenhael.goavec
2011-10-25 9:36 ` gwenhael.goavec
2011-10-25 11:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-26 7:40 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-10-08 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] [ARM] mach-types: Re-add apf9328 Wolfram Sang
2011-10-08 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-13 9:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-10-13 9:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-17 8:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-17 9:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-21 10:10 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-10-21 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-24 8:19 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111013090609.GT577@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).