From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:06:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [ARM] mach-types: Re-add apf9328 In-Reply-To: <20111008220722.GG25689@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1318087189-22977-1-git-send-email-gwenhael.goavec-merou@armadeus.com> <20111008192621.GA28049@pengutronix.de> <20111008220722.GG25689@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20111013090609.GT577@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 09:26:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:19:48PM +0200, Gwenhael Goavec-Merou wrote: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gwenhael Goavec-Merou > > > > I think this file is maintained by Russell, yet I want to ack that the entry > > below is missing for building mx1_defconfig. Found that, too. > > The thing is - read the comments at the top of the file. There's hints > there as to what will happen if you patch the file. The hint is > 'automatically generated'. So when I next update the file, any patches > done to the file will be wiped out. Currently the id is still missing in your for-next branch and it is marked as "mainlined" on http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ (906). That means that the next update should include the id, right? Maybe it's worth to add it already earlier with the patch Gwenhael proposed as without it mx1_defconfig is broken. After f32609c5a035 it even breaks imx_v4_v5_defconfig. BTW is there a way to see the mach-types file as it would land in linux.git if it were updated now? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |