linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/10] Per SoC descriptor
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:34:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111013153449.GG21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E9702F0.4070000@arm.com>

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:25:36PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 13/10/11 11:32, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 03:02:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>  65 files changed, 569 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This isn't particularly appealing for something that's supposed to
> > be a clean up - it's introducing 400+ new lines of code.  It looks like
> > most of this comes from the platform stuff rather than core stuff.
> > 
> > Can't we do any better with this?  We really need things to be going
> > in the other direction.
> 
> There is definitely room for improvement, by factoring in some common
> code across platforms. But I see that as a second phase, and started by
> just moving things to the SoC descriptor, all the code staying mostly
> the same.

I was meaning without that - what concerns me is the size of increase
just to introduce this.  It seems needlessly large.

I've also never been convinced by attempts to consolidate the hotplug
code - I've said this every time it's been suggested: I believe many
platforms just aren't trying to support hotplug CPU properly.

They've just copied the noddy Realview platform version - which is
noddy because ARMs platforms tend to have a total lack of power
management support on them.  The best we can do is put them in a WFI
loop waiting to be re-awoken.

Real platforms surely must have better PM support than that, and so
copying the Realview implementation does not make sense - it's good
to see that _some_ platforms have made an effort, though they still
just return from platform_cpu_die(), rather than the intended path of
re-awaking via the standard bringup path.  The return path from
platform_cpu_die() is supposed to be the last-ditch attempt if all else
has failed.

Note that doing that _also_ fixes the kexec problem that Will is
struggling with - if we can get that sorted we don't need to pen the
CPUs in a reserved area of memory while we kexec from one kernel to
the next - they can be kept in the boot loader while the kernel is
changed.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-10 14:02 [PATCH v5 00/10] Per SoC descriptor Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] ARM: SoC: Introduce per " Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] ARM: SoC: Add per SoC SMP and CPU hotplug operations Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] ARM: SoC: convert VExpress/RealView to SoC descriptor Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] ARM: SoC: convert OMAP4 " Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] ARM: SoC: convert Tegra " Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] ARM: SoC: convert Exynos4 " Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] ARM: SoC: convert MSM SMP " Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] ARM: SoC: convert ux500 " Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] ARM: SoC: convert shmobile sh73a0 " Marc Zyngier
2011-10-10 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] ARM: smp: Make SoC descriptor mandatory for SMP platforms Marc Zyngier
2011-10-13 10:32 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] Per SoC descriptor Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-13 15:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2011-10-13 15:34     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-10-13 16:14       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111013153449.GG21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).