From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] mach-ux500: remove intermediary add_platform_device* functions
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:59:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111017115908.GE4992@totoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318852378-14180-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Hi Lee,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> These are no longer required since a 'parent' pointer is now
> passed to each registering device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.c | 53 ----------------------------------
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h | 34 +++++++++------------
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-db8500.h | 10 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.c
> index b8d9a99..170975f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.c
> @@ -59,59 +59,6 @@ dbx500_add_amba_device(struct device *parent, const char *name,
> }
>
> static struct platform_device *
> -dbx500_add_platform_device(const char *name, int id, void *pdata,
> - struct resource *res, int resnum)
> -{
> - struct platform_device *dev;
> - int ret;
> -
> - dev = platform_device_alloc(name, id);
> - if (!dev)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
> - dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> - dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> -
> - ret = platform_device_add_resources(dev, res, resnum);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_free;
> -
> - dev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
> -
> - ret = platform_device_add(dev);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_free;
> -
> - return dev;
> -
> -out_free:
> - platform_device_put(dev);
> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
> -}
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h
> index f8adff8..089371e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.h
[...]
> -static inline struct platform_device *
> -dbx500_add_msp_i2s(int id, resource_size_t base, int irq,
> - struct msp_i2s_platform_data *pdata)
> -{
> - return dbx500_add_platform_device_4k1irq("MSP_I2S", id, base, irq,
> - pdata);
> + struct resource resources[] = {
> + DEFINE_RES_MEM(base, SZ_4K),
> + DEFINE_RES_IRQ(irq),
> + };
> +
> + return platform_device_register_resndata(parent, "nmk-i2c",
> + id, resources,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(resources),
> + pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
> }
I think you need platform_device_register_full() rather than
platform_device_register_resndata() here as dbx500_add_platform_device()
also set a dma mask which platform_device_register_resndata() doesn't
do. Otherwise a nice diffstat!
Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-17 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 11:52 [PATCH 0/6] ux500: Export SoC information and some platform clean-up Lee Jones
2011-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] mach-ux500: pass parent pointer to each platform device Lee Jones
2011-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] drivers/base: add bus for System-on-Chip devices Lee Jones
2011-10-17 12:13 ` Jamie Iles
2011-10-17 16:16 ` Greg KH
2011-10-17 18:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-17 18:25 ` Greg KH
2011-10-18 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-18 14:44 ` Greg KH
2011-10-18 11:12 ` Lee Jones
2011-10-18 14:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-18 14:41 ` Greg KH
2011-10-18 14:43 ` Greg KH
2011-10-17 16:18 ` Greg KH
2011-10-18 11:14 ` Lee Jones
2011-10-18 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-18 14:15 ` Jamie Iles
2011-10-18 14:38 ` Greg KH
2011-10-18 14:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-18 14:56 ` Jamie Iles
2011-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] Documentation: add information for new sysfs soc bus functionality Lee Jones
2011-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] mach-ux500: export System-on-Chip information ux500 via sysfs Lee Jones
2011-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] mach-ux500: move top level platform devices in sysfs to /sys/devices/socX Lee Jones
2011-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] mach-ux500: remove intermediary add_platform_device* functions Lee Jones
2011-10-17 11:59 ` Jamie Iles [this message]
2011-10-19 14:43 ` Lee Jones
2011-10-19 14:45 ` Jamie Iles
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-20 16:10 [PATCH 0/6] ux500: Export SoC information and some platform clean-up Lee Jones
2012-01-20 16:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] mach-ux500: remove intermediary add_platform_device* functions Lee Jones
2012-01-21 17:08 [PATCH 0/6] ux500: Export SoC information and some platform clean-up Lee Jones
2012-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH 6/6] mach-ux500: remove intermediary add_platform_device* functions Lee Jones
2012-02-01 9:23 [PATCH 0/6] ux500: Export SoC information and some platform clean-up Lee Jones
2012-02-01 9:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] mach-ux500: remove intermediary add_platform_device* functions Lee Jones
2012-02-06 19:22 [PATCH 0/6] ux500: Export SoC information and some platform clean-up Lee Jones
2012-02-06 19:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] mach-ux500: remove intermediary add_platform_device* functions Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111017115908.GE4992@totoro \
--to=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox