From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:18:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: SPMP8000: Add clk support In-Reply-To: <20111017121548.GH5448@sirena.org.uk> References: <1318178172-7965-1-git-send-email-zoss@devai.org> <1318178172-7965-4-git-send-email-zoss@devai.org> <20111013093836.GK21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111017121548.GH5448@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20111018101853.GM21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 04:16:45PM +0200, Zoltan Devai wrote: > > 2011/10/13 Russell King - ARM Linux : > > > > I find the use of 'scu' for something which isn't the SMP Coherence Unit Sorry, that should've been 'snoop control unit' to give its proper terminology. > > > rather confusing - and I suspect you will too if/when spmp8000 has SMP > > > support. > > > Well, Sunplus decided to name these devices 'SCU', which are a collection > > of reset, clock, debug, pinmux and gpio stuff. > > The datasheet doesn't even tell what SCU stands for, but I'd prefer to keep > > the naming to be in sync with the documentation. > > System Control Unit. It's a fairly common name to use for the core > system glue logic. So, what do we do about this confusing overloading of a TLA ? It's already had me searching through these patches for some reference to SMP stuff and wondering if its differing SMP implementation.