From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Warning at kernel/mutex.c
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:40:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111018184008.GI21504@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BKTzeV0f0=frQT-4uHESh2-cEQtc2UzniFT6dVSi_0EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:33:07PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > clk_enable() shouldn't be taking a mutex because drivers can _and_ do
> > call it from non-schedulable contexts. ?Unfortunately, some clk_enable
> > implementations do use a mutex.
> >
> > We have a transition path for this, discussed quite a while ago -
> > introducing clk_prepare() to do the slow bits of enabling a clock,
> > leaving clk_enable() for the fast stuff.
> >
>
> Thanks for the explanation, Russell.
>
> Sascha,
>
> Would the conversion from mutex to spinlock in clk_enable/disable work
> in the meantime?
>
> Please see below.
>
> OMAP/PXA/Tegra also use spinlock in clk_enable/disable.
>
> If this is OK then I can submit a proper patch for mxc and mxs.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock.c
> index a7093c8..1cdc21a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>
> static LIST_HEAD(clocks);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(clocks_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clock_lock);
If clocks_mutex is unused now, please remove it. If it's not unused you
probably introduced a problem with your patch.
Uwe
>
> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * Standard clock functions defined in include/linux/clk.h
> @@ -80,13 +81,14 @@ static int __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
> int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> if (clk == NULL || IS_ERR(clk))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&clocks_mutex);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&clock_lock, flags);
> ret = __clk_enable(clk);
> - mutex_unlock(&clocks_mutex);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clock_lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -98,12 +100,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_enable);
> */
> void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> if (clk == NULL || IS_ERR(clk))
> return;
>
> - mutex_lock(&clocks_mutex);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&clock_lock, flags);
> __clk_disable(clk);
> - mutex_unlock(&clocks_mutex);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clock_lock, flags);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_disable);
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-18 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-18 16:43 Warning at kernel/mutex.c Fabio Estevam
2011-10-18 17:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-18 18:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-10-18 18:33 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-10-18 18:40 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-10-18 18:45 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-10-19 6:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-10-19 6:54 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111018184008.GI21504@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).