From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:47:23 +0100 Subject: [RFC][PATCH] uncompress.h cleanup and DT support In-Reply-To: <20111023094309.GM15299@pengutronix.de> References: <20111023084132.GA12814@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111023092059.GB12814@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111023094309.GM15299@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20111023094723.GC12814@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:43:09AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:20:59AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:12:50AM +0200, Zoltan Devai wrote: > > > 2011/10/23 Russell King - ARM Linux : > > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:18:29AM +0200, Zoltan Devai wrote: > > > >> Plase consider all this as RFC, it's mostly not even compile-tested. > > > >> If you think it's worth to follow-up, I'm happy to do it. > > > > > > > > Is the patch available? > > > git://github.com/zdevai/linux.git uncompress-h > > > > I'd rather not pull your tree just to look at the patch. Is it > > available somewhere else? > It's not hard to look at it and no need to pull, just do: > > git fetch git://github.com/zdevai/linux.git uncompress-h > git log -p ..FETCH_HEAD .1 We do reviews in patch form on mailing lists, not from commits inside git trees. .2 I don't even want to pull the objects into my tree - that's a waste of bandwidth just to _read_ the patch, and risks pulling in a lot more depending on the parents of the commit. So, please stick to patch form. If it's too large for the mailing list, please split the patch up into a logical sequence of steps as individual patches. Only then provide a gitweb URL if that's not possible. If the diffstat at the start of this thread reflects a single patch then it's doing too much as one change.