From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: GIC MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER branches
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111025083157.GK4429@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111025082855.GB9290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [111025 09:54]:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:48:16AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> [111024 16:59]:
> > > I've stashed my patches for MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER on the following branches:
> > > git://github.com/mzyngier/arm-platforms.git gic-multi-irq
> > > git://github.com/mzyngier/arm-platforms.git gic-multi-irq-asm
> > >
> > > This is based on Russell's smp branch, plus my PPI patches that Russell
> > > has already pulled for the upcoming merge window.
> > >
> > > The difference between the two branches is that the second is keeping
> > > the ASM version of the GIC handler instead of a C version.
> > >
> > > The C version has been tested on VE, Realview, Tegra, and OMAP2/3/4.
> > > The ASM version has only been tested on OMAP4.
> >
> > For the record, boots fine on omap1/2/3/4 like I replied earlier
> > with my Tested-by.
> >
> > Can people please test this series on all subarchs so Marc can
> > then remove the remaining assembly code too.
>
> My feeling is that this is too disruptive to take for 3.2 now that the
> merge window is open: just adding Marc's PPI patches on Sunday caused
> a number of _horrible_ conflicts crop up. This probably is no
> different.
>
> So, let's postpone this kind of stuff until after this merge window has
> closed.
OK, I was hoping we could get it in without the assembly changes..
> (BTW, Linus won't be pulling major stuff which hasn't been in linux-next -
> see the 3.1 announcement.)
..but yeah I guess it's too late now.
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-25 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-24 15:26 GIC MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER branches Marc Zyngier
2011-10-25 7:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-10-25 8:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-25 8:31 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111025083157.GK4429@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).