From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma: Drop GFP_COMP for DMA memory allocations
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:36:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111031103610.GG19187@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319836732-31687-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:18:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I believe the patch below was once posted to solve this for ARM, but never
> got picked up. Evidently, AVR32 did pick it up. I'm wondering if we should
> pick this up for ARM now, or if there's some other solution?
Well, Nick did talk about a solution using GFP_USERMAP in one of those
threads, which doesn't seem to have gone anywhere. So I guess we need
this patch.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 82a093c..93b86e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,13 @@ __dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp,
> struct page *page;
> void *addr;
>
> + /* Following is a work-around (a.k.a. hack) to prevent pages
> + * with __GFP_COMP being passed to split_page() which cannot
> + * handle them. The real problem is that this flag probably
> + * should be 0 on ARM as it is not supported on this
> + * platform--see CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE. */
I don't think this comment makes sense anymore - HUGETLB_PAGE doesn't
have any help text.
> + gfp &= ~(__GFP_COMP);
> +
> *handle = ~0;
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
>
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-28 21:18 [RFC PATCH] arm: dma: Drop GFP_COMP for DMA memory allocations Stephen Warren
2011-10-31 10:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111031103610.GG19187@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox