From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 02/10] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:03:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111103150337.GC5008@totoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111103133102.GM12913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:31:02PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > ? ? ? ?stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
> > > ? ? ? ?while (stat) {
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?while (stat) {
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?irq = ffs(stat) - 1;
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?stat &= ~(1 << irq);
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?handle_irq(irq);
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
> > > ? ? ? ?}
> > >
> > > This ensures that we process all interrupts found pending before we
> > > re-check for any new interrupts pending. ?Arguably this is a much
> > > fairer implementation (and may mean if things get irrevokably stuck,
> > > things like sysrq via the console uart may still work.)
> >
> > I really like the looks of this, Jamie can you do it like that?
> >
> > Maybe some smallish comment about what's going on can be
> > good for future generations reading that code...
>
> Bear in mind that it gets a little more complex when you have more
> than one VIC, because the outer loop should be across all VICs.
OK, so I think what I posted yesterday does that (updated for slightly
better naming) and with a description. In the spirit of fairness
iterating over the VIC's this way seemed right to me.
/*
* Handle each interrupt in a single VIC. Returns non-zero if we've
* handled at least one interrupt. This does a single read of the
* status register and handles all interrupts in order from LSB first.
*/
static int handle_one_vic(struct vic_device *vic,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
u32 stat, irq;
int handled = 0;
stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
while (stat) {
irq = ffs(stat) - 1;
handle_IRQ(irq_domain_to_irq(&vic->domain, irq), regs);
stat &= ~(1 << irq);
handled = 1;
}
return handled;
}
/*
* Keep iterating over all registered VIC's until there are no pending
* interrupts.
*/
asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry vic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int i, handled;
do {
for (i = 0, handled = 0; i < vic_id; ++i)
handled |= vic_single_handle_irq(&vic_devices[i],
regs))
} while (handled);
}
Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-03 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-28 10:41 [PATCHv2 00/10] VIC DT binding and MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: vic: device tree binding Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 20:11 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-29 4:00 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 02/10] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:09 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 12:08 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 20:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-29 6:55 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-29 9:30 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-29 16:55 ` Grant Likely
2011-11-02 13:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-02 14:08 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-03 12:29 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-03 12:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-03 13:00 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-03 13:04 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-03 13:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-03 15:03 ` Jamie Iles [this message]
2011-11-03 15:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-03 13:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-29 15:03 ` Zoltan Devai
2011-09-29 15:13 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 03/10] ARM: ep93xx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:15 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 04/10] ARM: netx: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 05/10] ARM: nomadik: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:12 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 07/10] ARM: spear: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 08/10] ARM: u300: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:03 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 12:03 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 12:18 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 12:29 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 09/10] ARM: versatile: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 10/10] ARM: samsung: " Jamie Iles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111103150337.GC5008@totoro \
--to=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).