From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:51:21 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v3.2 merge window breakage In-Reply-To: <20111108004457.GO15294@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20111107204929.GZ31337@atomide.com> <20111107212919.GI15294@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111107214724.GA31337@atomide.com> <20111108001840.GF31337@atomide.com> <20111108004214.GN15294@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111108004457.GO15294@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20111108005120.GI31337@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [111107 16:10]: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:42:14AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:18:41PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren [111107 13:12]: > > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [111107 12:54]: > > > > > Arnd, > > > > > > > > > > Don't pull this - there's yet more crap in OMAP to be fixed before > > > > > these go to mainline. OMAP3 is severely broken at the moment with, > > > > > to put it bluntly, totally fucked up OMAP hwmod code, and should be > > > > > fixed *now* by folk before this pull request. > > > > > > > > > > The fixes are damned trivial I expect even Tony can fix it without > > > > > reference to Paul. > > > > > > > > > > ARM: OMAP3: hwmod: fix variant registration and remove SmartReflex from common list > > > > > > > > Sounds like the above patch already queued should fix the issues you > > > > are seeing with hwmod? > > > > > > > > Or do you still have other issues you're having? > > > > > > Sounds like all Russell's issues are all dealt with: > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132070787220812&w=2 > > > > > > Arnd, if you have not pulled yet, Kevin just posted one more export.h > > > fix for THIS_MODULE for cpuidle. I'll add that patch into fixes, > > > and will post a new pull request. > > > > Arnd isn't around much at the moment. > > > > I've forwarded your request to Linus already, so adding to it may not go > > down too well. OK, well looks like the earlier version got pulled in. > For the avoidance of doubt, as you've already updated it leave it as-is. Let's leave that for another series then. Tony