From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:47:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 4/7] arm: omap4: hwmod: introduce emu hwmod In-Reply-To: <20111111114147.GE12410@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1319467559-5518-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <1319467559-5518-5-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <20111111114147.GE12410@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20111111114735.GC5114@totoro> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:41:47AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > [Adding Benoit to CC]. > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:02:14AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Ming Lei wrote: > > > Also, current arm perf code don't handle three IRQs(one pl310 irq and > > > two CTI irq) inside one device correctly. > > > > To fix this, that ARM perf code should either be using > > platform_get_irq_byname(), or the hwmod hardware data will need to be > > rearranged to meet the arbitrary ordering requirement. I'd suggest > > pinging Will on this issue to see what he wants to do. > > The issue stems from the fact that we have to route the PMU interrupts to > the correct CPU manually (I think only MSM routes them as PPIs, which is > clearly the correct thing to do). To do this, we expect the IRQ resources to > be laid out in CPU order. In hindsight, maybe naming the resources might > have been a good idea, but them we'd still have to generate the names using > CPU numbers when iterating through the platform device. There isn't yet a way to do naming of resources with DT, and although I think there was a proposal for doing named register resources I don't think this has been accepted and there wasn't anything for IRQ resources... Jamie