From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:10:40 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] VIC DT+MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER patches In-Reply-To: References: <20111111123007.GD5114@totoro> Message-ID: <20111111151040.GF5114@totoro> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:31:26PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > Hi Jamie, > > On 11 November 2011 18:00, Jamie Iles wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > > > I've updated the VIC series to include export.h and added some Tested-by > > and Acked-by's. > > > > This is dependent on https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/10/186 (irq: fix > > possible null-pointer deref irq_domain_to_irq) which hasn't been picked > > up yet so I understand if you don't want to hold up your GIC patches, > > but I'll defer to you on that! > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jamie > > > > The following changes since commit ad2cf1a746915c5c95edaba104dcb50023fb18d1: > > > > ?ARM: GIC: Make MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER mandatory (2011-11-08 10:10:10 +0000) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > ?git://github.com/jamieiles/linux-2.6-ji.git vic-dt > > > > Jamie Iles (11): > > ? ? ?ARM: vic: device tree binding > > ? ? ?ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler > > ? ? ?ARM: ep93xx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: netx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: nomadik: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: spear: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: u300: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: versatile: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: samsung: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: picoxcell: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER > > ? ? ?ARM: VIC: remove non MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER support > > There was a patch "[PATCHv4 07/13] ARM: s3c64xx: convert to > MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER" in your series. Is this patch dropped in this pull > request? Crap, that should be there. When I was rebasing and adding your Tested-by, git did say something about a bad reference but it all looked OK so I thought it was fine. Marc, would you mind redoing the pull to get the correct series. Unfortunately I had to rebase to keep it bisectable. Thanks, Jamie