[PATCH] ARM: Add lsxhl machine type to mach-types

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:29:56AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:40:42AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > then, i guess, the problem is on the uboot side, at least if they want to
> > > support both device tree based and old-fashioned setup code (eg.
> > > backported device support.)
> > 
> > If uboot wants to carry the full list, rather than copying it from
> > the kernel source, they should be going straight to the main source
> > of the file (which is given inside the file itself.)
> > 
> > Otherwise, if they want to be purely dependent on the version shipped
> > with the kernel, which will have entries for platforms not merged into
> > the kernel source deleted from it once they're older than 12 months -
> > but which may be in u-boot, they can continue taking it out of the
> > kernel tree.  I think that's sub-optimal as they'll see regressions
> > from time to time when platforms have been merged into u-boot but not
> > the kernel.
> 
> Hey,
> 
> U-Boot follows the in-kernel mach-types file. We had a few issues with boards 
> not building due to the removal of old mach types.

As the kernel version of the file is now specifically customised for
the kernel, u-boot should _not_ follow the kernel version anymore, as
I pointed out.  u-boot need to change this policy of theirs.

The file has always been and remains available on the web.  There's
absolutely no need for u-boot to take the customised version from the
kernel source.