From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:15:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 04/41] ARM: restart: at91: use new restart hook In-Reply-To: <20111115085202.GB8574@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20111106173113.GI12913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111115011610.GF15318@game.jcrosoft.org> <20111115085202.GB8574@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20111115091522.GB19322@game.jcrosoft.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08:52 Tue 15 Nov , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 02:16:10AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 17:41 Sun 06 Nov , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > Rather than using a private function pointer, use the existing > > > arm_pm_restart function pointer instead. We no longer need to enable > > > the I-cache in at91sam9_alt_reset() as the caches will now be on when > > > this function is called. > > > > > > Update the function names to use the 'restart' terminology rather than > > > the 'reboot' terminology. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > > --- > > I'll appply this one via at91-treee as I've patch that touch this part too in > > the queue if you do'nt mind > > Which will break my patch queue. As I said to Tony, I'm looking to > stabilize this in about a week and a half's time, at which point > you'll be able to pull these changes into your tree. so let do the invert mine is stable will go to the next today Best Regards, J.