From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p-combes@ti.com (Patrick Combes) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:30:13 +0100 Subject: [RFC][PATCH] gpiolib: add irq_wake (power-management) sysfs file In-Reply-To: <20111115131636.GA31028@sirena.org.uk> References: <1321004406-15663-1-git-send-email-p-combes@ti.com> <20111115131636.GA31028@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20111116143011.GA5847@una0919255> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:16:37PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:40:06AM +0100, Patrick Combes wrote: > > > By calling poll() on the /sys/class/gpio/gpioN/value sysfs file, usermode > > application can take benefit of gpio interrupts. > > However, depending on the power state reached, this interrupt may not wake-up > > the CPU. > > This patch creates a new sysfs file /sys/class/gpio/gpioN/irq_wake to enable > > usermode application to set the wake properties of a gpio IRQ. > > This option can be set or not for each gpio to preserve power consumption (e.g > > embedded systems). > > There's already device global control for this in sysfs via the power > framework - I didn't know so I had a (quick) look at it. It seems to me that this interface will fit better for a global GPIO wakeup capability. By the way, this is maybe what you mean by 'global control'... Therefore, there is still a need (at least I have) for an interface with a deeper granularity. > > Also... > > > + else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "enable") || sysfs_streq(buf, "1")) > > + status = enable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(gpio)); > > + else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "disable") || sysfs_streq(buf, "0")) > > + status = disable_irq_wake(gpio_to_irq(gpio)); > > + else > > + status = -EINVAL; > > ...this doesn't do anything to stop userspace doing multiple enables and > disables. Do you mean there is a need to prevent that? Basically the code above accepts both "1" or "enable" strings to enable the property. I could limit that to "enable" / "disable" if it is confusing. > > > + if (gpio_irq_data) > > + status = sprintf(buf, " Wakeup %s\n", > > + irqd_is_wakeup_set(gpio_irq_data) > > + ? " enable" : "disable"); > > This is *really* non-idiomatic for sysfs output, you'd expect the sysfs > output to look like the input. It's supposed to machine parsable... Maybe good for the debug but not for a parser; I fix it.