From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:23:44 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
In-Reply-To: <33510089.42761321876635907.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml08>
References: <33510089.42761321876635907.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml08>
Message-ID: <20111121172344.GA4483@kroah.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > To: Jingoo Han
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-usb at vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim at samsung.com; yulgon.kim at samsung.com;
> > jy0922.shim at samsung.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for Samsung
> > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > board
> > > using EXYNOS4.
> > 
> > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> Thanks.
> [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver

So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
right?

If so, then all three should go through a single tree.

greg k-h