From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: add jump label support
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:42:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122194213.GC9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321888429-3519-4-git-send-email-rabin@rab.in>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:43:49PM +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> Add the arch-specific code to support jump labels for ARM and Thumb-2.
>
> Note that to build succesfully it requires (what will be) GCC 4.7.0
> because of incomplete support for the '%c' specifier in earlier
> versions:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48637
>
> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
This appears to imply that with this patch, we're upping the minimum
gcc version for successfully building kernels to 4.7.0. That's _way_
too early (I'm using 4.3.5 here and don't have plans to update.)
> +static inline unsigned long
> +arm_gen_nop(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
> + return 0xf3af8000; /* nop.w */
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K)
> + return 0xe320f000; /* nop */
> +#else
> + return 0xe1a00000; /* mov r0, r0 */
There really is no point making the distinction between the new nop
and the old nop instructions. The difference between them is that the
new nop is a true 'no operation' whereas the old nop causes exactly
what the instruction says to happen - which in effect is a no-op.
Obviously, doing a true no-operation may require in less power, but
if you're using this code, you're debugging, so power usage isn't
really a concern. So lets keep the code simple and just use the old
nop here. It won't go away.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-21 15:13 [PATCH 1/4] ARM: ftrace: use canonical Thumb-2 wide instruction format Rabin Vincent
2011-11-21 15:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: extract out insn generation code from ftrace Rabin Vincent
2011-11-22 12:02 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-22 13:32 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-11-22 13:56 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-22 18:25 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-11-23 11:50 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-24 16:10 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-11-21 15:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: extract out code patch function from kprobes Rabin Vincent
2011-11-22 8:48 ` Tixy
2011-11-22 18:03 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-11-21 15:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: add jump label support Rabin Vincent
2011-11-22 19:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-11-22 23:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-11-22 23:39 ` Jason Baron
2011-11-22 23:50 ` Jason Baron
2011-11-23 14:55 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-11-23 17:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-28 17:04 ` Rabin Vincent
2012-01-24 15:43 ` Rabin Vincent
2012-01-24 16:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-24 16:57 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-11-22 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: ftrace: use canonical Thumb-2 wide instruction format Dave Martin
2011-11-22 18:00 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-11-23 14:42 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-24 7:22 ` Bi Junxiao
2011-11-25 10:10 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111122194213.GC9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).