From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: vic: register the VIC for ST-modified VIC's
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:43:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111123154332.GE7382@totoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECD13AE.6060409@stericsson.com>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 04:28 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> >When probing the VIC, the ST variant has a different probing method to
> >account for the extra interrupts which meant we didn't previously call
> >vic_register() which registered the irq_domain.
> >
> >Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> >Cc: Russell King<rmk+linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> >Cc: Marc Zyngier<marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles<jamie@jamieiles.com>
> >---
> >
> >I _think_ it's just Nomadik affected here which I don't have access to.
> >I can send an updated pull request or put it in Russell's tracker,
> >whichever is easiest.
>
> This also affects mach-u300 and mach-ep93xx OTOH.
>
> This seems to be based on something else that is out-of-tree
> so I don't get the whole picture...
Sorry, should have specified the base - this is the VIC device
tree/MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER stuff that is in next. I did look at u300 and
ep93xx, but it looks like their VIC's are 0x1000/0x10000 apart
respectively when registered so weren't the ST type that supported 64
IRQ's.
Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 15:28 [PATCH] ARM: vic: register the VIC for ST-modified VIC's Jamie Iles
2011-11-23 15:39 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-23 15:43 ` Jamie Iles [this message]
2011-11-23 15:53 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-24 10:59 ` Jamie Iles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111123154332.GE7382@totoro \
--to=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).