From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:43:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: vic: register the VIC for ST-modified VIC's In-Reply-To: <4ECD13AE.6060409@stericsson.com> References: <1322062110-24084-1-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com> <4ECD13AE.6060409@stericsson.com> Message-ID: <20111123154332.GE7382@totoro> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On 11/23/2011 04:28 PM, Jamie Iles wrote: > >When probing the VIC, the ST variant has a different probing method to > >account for the extra interrupts which meant we didn't previously call > >vic_register() which registered the irq_domain. > > > >Cc: Linus Walleij > >Cc: Russell King > >Cc: Marc Zyngier > >Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles > >--- > > > >I _think_ it's just Nomadik affected here which I don't have access to. > >I can send an updated pull request or put it in Russell's tracker, > >whichever is easiest. > > This also affects mach-u300 and mach-ep93xx OTOH. > > This seems to be based on something else that is out-of-tree > so I don't get the whole picture... Sorry, should have specified the base - this is the VIC device tree/MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER stuff that is in next. I did look at u300 and ep93xx, but it looks like their VIC's are 0x1000/0x10000 apart respectively when registered so weren't the ST type that supported 64 IRQ's. Jamie