From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:14:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111124071406.GS19986@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111123225124.GK9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:51:24PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:36:40PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:44:50AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > Looks like the same error I faced before:
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=131914543319956&w=2
> > which resulted in some concerns about locking correctness. On i.MX28 we
> > usually use
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/100744/focus=100746
> >
> > (though this patch wasn't accepted either. The right fix is to convert
> > mxs to the upcoming clk framework, which didn't land into mainline yet.)
>
> Irrespective of the clk framework. If you convert to the clk_prepare()
> methodology, then you fix this bug. You can do this as a two-step thing.
Yeah, OK, I should have said:
The right fix is to make clk_enable atomic on mxs which back
then was agreed to be done when converting to the new clk
framework.
> [..]
>
> So really, there's no excuse not to fix this for the imx/mxwhatever SoCs
> today - the clk framework is totally irrelevant as far as this goes.
I think doing the clk_prepare seperation and converting to the clk
framework in one step will be easier.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 11:36 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context Peter Rusko
2011-11-23 12:44 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-11-23 13:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-11-23 18:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-23 22:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-24 6:32 ` Shawn Guo
2011-11-24 7:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-11-24 9:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-24 9:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-24 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-24 14:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-10 5:38 Amit Virdi
2011-05-10 9:32 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111124071406.GS19986@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).