linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix unwinding for XIP kernels
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:22:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111128092217.GG17668@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111121183545.GF3272@arm.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:35:45PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:28:09AM +0000, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:17:06PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:40:00PM +0000, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > The linker places the unwind tables in readonly sections. So when using
> > > > an XIP kernel these are located in ROM and cannot be modified.
> > > > 
> > > > For that reason don't convert the symbol addresses during boot (or
> > > > module loading) but only when interpreting them in search_index().
> > > > Moreover several consts are added to catch future writes and rename the
> > > > member "addr" of struct unwind_idx to "addr_offset" to better match the
> > > > new semantic.
> > > > 
> > > > This fixes unwinding on XIP which compared prel31 offsets to absolute
> > > > addresses because the initial conversion from prel31 to absolute failed.
> > > 
> > > My only worry - does this increase the index search by doing the prel31
> > > conversion every time? It could affect tools like lockdep that need to
> > > get the backtrace regularly at run-time.
> > I did a first test now using 
> > 
> > 	static int __init unwind_test(void)
> 
> With your latest patch, have you tried dropping __init from this
> function? Since the .init.text section goes after the unwind_idx tables,
> all the prel31 offsets are positive and the number of init functions is
> smaller than the run-time ones.
Yeah, it works fine. In fact unwinding unwind_test yields:

	do_one_initcall+0x50/0x158
	kernel_init+0x78/0x120
	kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8

where kernel_thread_exit is not in .init.text, too.

I don't know why you asked? Did you see a bug? Or is it just to let me
do enough testing before you start reviewing my patches?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-28  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-17 13:40 [PATCH] ARM: fix unwinding for XIP kernels Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-17 14:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-17 18:59   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-18 18:28   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-11-18 21:36     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-20 11:28   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-20 22:52     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-20 23:12       ` [PATCH RFC] ARM: unwind: optimize to not convert each table value but the address Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-21 16:34         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-21 18:16           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-30 17:58         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-30 19:07           ` [PATCH] ARM: fix unwinding for XIP kernels Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-30 19:37             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-11-30 19:52             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-21 18:35     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-28  9:22       ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-11-28  9:45         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-28 10:02           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-28 10:07             ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111128092217.GG17668@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).