From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:27:20 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Add generic instruction opcode manipulation helpers In-Reply-To: <1322575568.4500.39.camel@linaro1> References: <1322220493-3251-1-git-send-email-dave.martin@linaro.org> <20111128174122.GG2465@localhost.localdomain> <1322508033.2354.86.camel@computer2> <20111129104255.GA2829@localhost.localdomain> <1322575568.4500.39.camel@linaro1> Message-ID: <20111129152720.GB2829@localhost.localdomain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:06:08PM +0000, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 10:42 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > Do you care about being to able to set probes in Thumb user code when > > the kernel is not Thumb-2, or do you simply not support that scenario > > at all? (Thinking about, I'm guessing we don't currently support that?) > > kprobes are only designed to probe kernel code, that's what the 'k' > stands for. ;-) Right, I think I may have been confusing that with some ftrace features. Cheers ---Dave