linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] virtio: use mandatory barriers for remote processor vdevs
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:12:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111201081236.GB5479@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zkfdrpn8.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:58:59PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:13:07 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > For x86, stores into memory are ordered. So I think that yes, smp_XXX
> > can be selected at compile time.
> > 
> > So let's forget the virtio strangeness for a minute,
> 
> Hmm, we got away with light barriers because we knew we were not
> *really* talking to a device.  But now with virtio-mmio, turns out we
> are :)

You think virtio-mmio this issue too?  It's reported on remoteproc...

> I'm really tempted to revert d57ed95 for 3.2, and we can revisit this
> optimization later if it proves worthwhile.
> 
> Thoughts?
> Rusty. 

Generally it does seem the best we can do for 3.2.

Given it's rc3, I'd be a bit wary of introducing regressions - I'll try
to find some real setups (as in - not my laptop) to run some benchmarks
on, to verify there's no major problem.
I hope I can report on this in about a week from now - want to hold onto this meanwhile?

Further, if we do revert, need to remember to apply the following
beforehand, to avoid breaking virtio tool:

tools/virtio: implement mandatory barriers for x86

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

diff --git a/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h b/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
index 68b8b8d..1bf0e80 100644
--- a/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
+++ b/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
@@ -172,11 +172,18 @@ struct virtqueue {
 #define MODULE_LICENSE(__MODULE_LICENSE_value) \
 	const char *__MODULE_LICENSE_name = __MODULE_LICENSE_value
 
 #define CONFIG_SMP
 
 #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
 #define barrier() asm volatile("" ::: "memory")
 #define mb() __sync_synchronize()
+#if defined(__i386__)
+#define wmb() mb()
+#define rmb() mb()
+#else
+#define wmb() asm volatile("sfence" ::: "memory")
+#define rmb() asm volatile("lfence" ::: "memory")
+#endif
 
 #define smp_mb()	mb()
 # define smp_rmb()	barrier()

-- 
MST

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-29 12:31 [RFC] virtio: use mandatory barriers for remote processor vdevs Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 13:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 13:57   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 15:16     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 11:45       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 14:59         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 16:04           ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 16:15             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 16:24               ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 23:27                 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 23:43                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-01  6:20                     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 15:19     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 11:55       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 14:50         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 22:43           ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 23:13             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-01  2:28               ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-01  7:15                 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-12-01  8:12                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-12-02  0:26                   ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-01  6:14               ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-12-01  9:09                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-02 23:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-03  5:14   ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-11 12:25     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-11 22:27       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-12  3:06         ` Amos Kong
2011-12-12  5:12           ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-12 23:56             ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19  2:35               ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-19  2:19             ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19  2:41               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-19  7:21                 ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19  2:50               ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19  8:37                 ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-03  6:01   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111201081236.GB5479@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).