From: mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] virtio: use mandatory barriers for remote processor vdevs
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:12:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111201081236.GB5479@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zkfdrpn8.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:58:59PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:13:07 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > For x86, stores into memory are ordered. So I think that yes, smp_XXX
> > can be selected at compile time.
> >
> > So let's forget the virtio strangeness for a minute,
>
> Hmm, we got away with light barriers because we knew we were not
> *really* talking to a device. But now with virtio-mmio, turns out we
> are :)
You think virtio-mmio this issue too? It's reported on remoteproc...
> I'm really tempted to revert d57ed95 for 3.2, and we can revisit this
> optimization later if it proves worthwhile.
>
> Thoughts?
> Rusty.
Generally it does seem the best we can do for 3.2.
Given it's rc3, I'd be a bit wary of introducing regressions - I'll try
to find some real setups (as in - not my laptop) to run some benchmarks
on, to verify there's no major problem.
I hope I can report on this in about a week from now - want to hold onto this meanwhile?
Further, if we do revert, need to remember to apply the following
beforehand, to avoid breaking virtio tool:
tools/virtio: implement mandatory barriers for x86
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
diff --git a/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h b/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
index 68b8b8d..1bf0e80 100644
--- a/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
+++ b/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
@@ -172,11 +172,18 @@ struct virtqueue {
#define MODULE_LICENSE(__MODULE_LICENSE_value) \
const char *__MODULE_LICENSE_name = __MODULE_LICENSE_value
#define CONFIG_SMP
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
#define barrier() asm volatile("" ::: "memory")
#define mb() __sync_synchronize()
+#if defined(__i386__)
+#define wmb() mb()
+#define rmb() mb()
+#else
+#define wmb() asm volatile("sfence" ::: "memory")
+#define rmb() asm volatile("lfence" ::: "memory")
+#endif
#define smp_mb() mb()
# define smp_rmb() barrier()
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 12:31 [RFC] virtio: use mandatory barriers for remote processor vdevs Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 13:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 13:57 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 15:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 11:45 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 14:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 16:04 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 16:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 16:24 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 23:27 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 23:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-01 6:20 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 15:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 11:55 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 14:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 22:43 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 23:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-01 2:28 ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-01 7:15 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-12-01 8:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-12-02 0:26 ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-01 6:14 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-12-01 9:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-02 23:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-03 5:14 ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-11 12:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-11 22:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-12 3:06 ` Amos Kong
2011-12-12 5:12 ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-12 23:56 ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19 2:35 ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-19 2:19 ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19 2:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-19 7:21 ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19 2:50 ` Amos Kong
2011-12-19 8:37 ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-03 6:01 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111201081236.GB5479@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).