From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:54:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data In-Reply-To: References: <1321615040-13257-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1321615040-13257-2-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> Message-ID: <20111204155433.GA16287@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 06:51:23PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > For regulators that are not turned on by bootloader, and which require > 'apply_uV' constraint, is there any alternative for turning on the > regulator when using dt? If the regulator isn't software managed then always_on covers this - the regulator core will enable any always_on regulators that haven't been enabled already. > /* do we need to apply the constraint voltage */ > - if (rdev->constraints->apply_uV && > - rdev->constraints->min_uV == rdev->constraints->max_uV) { > + if ((rdev->constraints->apply_uV && > + rdev->constraints->min_uV == rdev->constraints->max_uV) || > + (!rdev->constraints->boot_on && rdev->constraints->always_on)) { > ret = _regulator_do_set_voltage(rdev, > rdev->constraints->min_uV, > rdev->constraints->max_uV); I'm not sure I understand the intended logic there. Voltage constraints and enable/disable constraints are orthogonal here.