From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:03:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111206110328.GP14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXvuwXps7j2jz18aB1VueLh5Vn0m94jLvBEO-CmsG1JxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:00:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:46, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > But.. let's make one thing clear: Alan Cox and Linus have been going on
> > about how IRQ0 should not be used. ?Let's be crystal clear: even x86
> > uses IRQ0. ?It happens to be the PIC timer, and that gets claimed early
> > on during the x86 boot. ?So please don't tell me that x86 avoids IRQ0.
> > It doesn't. ?It just happens that x86 never shows IRQ0 to anything but
> > the i8253 PIC driver.
>
> It's shown in /proc/interrupts due to a "bug" in show_interrupts().
> The (gmail damaged) patch below fixes this bug.
So we now try to hide the fact that there _is_ an interrupt called 0
on x86 systems? Sorry, I can't that that seriously in any way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20111110162859.GA7088@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
[not found] ` <20111202192618.GC3037@localhost.localdomain>
2011-12-02 19:28 ` [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver Linus Torvalds
2011-12-02 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-12-05 16:11 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-05 17:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-05 18:02 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-05 18:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-12-05 18:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-05 18:45 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2011-12-06 6:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-12-06 11:34 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 19:16 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-05 20:21 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-12-05 20:47 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-05 20:53 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 9:30 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-05 19:26 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-05 19:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-06 9:37 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 11:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-12-06 11:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-12-06 11:10 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:05 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 12:11 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:37 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 11:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 13:25 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-06 19:56 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-06 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-12-06 20:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-06 20:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-06 19:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-05 17:41 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111206110328.GP14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).