linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd.bergmann@linaro.org (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Add common ARM cpuidle init code
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:37:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112081537.04789.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111208145653.GF7913@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>

On Thursday 08 December 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > 
> With many drivers are being moved into drivers/* from arch/arm/mach-*
> and arch/arm/plat-*, I'm wondering if we have any problem with doing
> the same thing on cpuidle.  If we can move these cpuidle drivers into
> drivers/cpuidle (or drivers/idle, I'm not sure why two folders), that
> will be the best place for such consolidation to me.
> 
> Cc-ed linux-pm and Len Brown for helping understand.

I think we should definitely move them into one of the two directories.
The one thing making this a bit nasty is that many SoC implementation
need to access some global registers for this and don't have a "device"
that can be used for cpuidle with its own register ranges, but it's
still better to have the code in a single place IMHO.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-08 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-06  4:38 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Add common ARM cpuidle init code Robert Lee
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] ARM: Add commonly used " Robert Lee
2011-12-06 11:47   ` Mark Brown
2011-12-08 17:34     ` Rob Lee
2011-12-09  8:25       ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 15:06   ` Rob Herring
2011-12-08 21:46     ` Rob Lee
2011-12-09 13:54       ` Rob Herring
2011-12-09 15:55         ` Rob Lee
2011-12-09 19:48         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] ARM: at91: Replace init with new common ARM " Robert Lee
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] ARM: kirkwood: " Robert Lee
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] ARM: exynos: " Robert Lee
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] ARM: davinci: " Robert Lee
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] ARM: shmobile: " Robert Lee
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] ARM: imx: Add mx5 clock changes necessary for low power Robert Lee
2011-12-06  4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] ARM: imx: Add mx5 cpuidle implmentation Robert Lee
2011-12-08 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Add common ARM cpuidle init code Shawn Guo
2011-12-08 15:37   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-01-03 14:54     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-03 16:02       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-04  9:17         ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-04 18:05           ` Rob Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201112081537.04789.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
    --to=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).