From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:02:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts In-Reply-To: References: <1323361659-11835-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <1323361659-11835-2-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <20111209044109.GB26952@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20111209060249.GD26952@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:55:10AM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On 9 December 2011 10:11, Mark Brown > > Removing irq_base from platform data isn't going to be helpful for > > anyone using the driver on non-DT platforms as it's going to make it > > impossible to find the interrupts. > All the consumers of the max8997 interrupts are the drivers for the > sub-blocks of max8997. These drivers have access to 'irq_domain' > member of 'struct max8997_dev', From irq_domain, the sub-block driver > can get the irq_base and add one of the 'enum max8997_irq' offset when > registering for interrupt notifications. There's no GPIOs with interrupt support (even if they're not implemented yet)?