* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-12-09 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code check v3 Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-09 18:54 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 13:20 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for nwfpe Leif Lindholm
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Leif Lindholm @ 2011-12-09 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch breaks the ARM condition checking code out of nwfpe/fpopcode.{ch}
into a standalone file for opcode operations. It also modifies the code
somewhat for coding style adherence, and adds some temporary variables for
increased readability.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h | 20 +++++++++++
arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..aea97bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
+#define __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
+#endif
+
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL 0
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS 1
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND 2
+
+#endif /* __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
index 16eed6a..43b740d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
# Object file lists.
-obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \
+obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o opcodes.o \
process.o ptrace.o return_address.o setup.o signal.o \
sys_arm.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f8179c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * linux/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
+ *
+ * A32 condition code lookup feature moved from nwfpe/fpopcode.c
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/opcodes.h>
+
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
+
+/*
+ * condition code lookup table
+ * index into the table is test code: EQ, NE, ... LT, GT, AL, NV
+ *
+ * bit position in short is condition code: NZCV
+ */
+static const unsigned short cc_map[16] = {
+ 0xF0F0, /* EQ == Z set */
+ 0x0F0F, /* NE */
+ 0xCCCC, /* CS == C set */
+ 0x3333, /* CC */
+ 0xFF00, /* MI == N set */
+ 0x00FF, /* PL */
+ 0xAAAA, /* VS == V set */
+ 0x5555, /* VC */
+ 0x0C0C, /* HI == C set && Z clear */
+ 0xF3F3, /* LS == C clear || Z set */
+ 0xAA55, /* GE == (N==V) */
+ 0x55AA, /* LT == (N!=V) */
+ 0x0A05, /* GT == (!Z && (N==V)) */
+ 0xF5FA, /* LE == (Z || (N!=V)) */
+ 0xFFFF, /* AL always */
+ 0 /* NV */
+};
+
+/*
+ * Returns:
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL - if condition fails
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS - if condition passes (including AL)
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND - if NV condition, or separate unconditional
+ * opcode space from v5 onwards
+ *
+ * Code that tests whether a conditional instruction would pass its condition
+ * check should check that return value == ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS.
+ *
+ * Code that tests if a condition means that the instruction would be executed
+ * (regardless of conditional or unconditional) should instead check that the
+ * return value != ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL.
+ */
+asmlinkage unsigned int arm_check_condition(u32 opcode, u32 psr)
+{
+ u32 cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
+ u32 psr_cond = psr >> 28;
+ unsigned int ret;
+
+ if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
+ if ((cc_map[cc_bits] >> (psr_cond)) & 1)
+ ret = ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
+ else
+ ret = ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
+ } else {
+ ret = ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_check_condition);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-10 13:20 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2011-12-10 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 06:54:29PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..aea97bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +#define __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
> +#endif
You forgot to update the prototype arguments.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for nwfpe.
2011-12-09 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code check v3 Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-09 18:54 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] Add condition code checking to SWP emulation handler Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes Leif Lindholm
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Leif Lindholm @ 2011-12-09 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch changes the nwfpe implementation to use the new generic
ARM instruction set condition code checks, rather than a local
implementation. It also removes the existing condition code checking,
which has been used for the generic support (in kernel/opcodes.{ch}).
This code has not been tested beyond building, linking and booting.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/nwfpe/entry.S | 8 +++++---
arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.c | 26 --------------------------
arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h | 3 ---
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/entry.S b/arch/arm/nwfpe/entry.S
index cafa183..d18dde9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/entry.S
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*/
+#include <asm/opcodes.h>
+
/* This is the kernel's entry point into the floating point emulator.
It is called from the kernel with code similar to this:
@@ -81,11 +83,11 @@ nwfpe_enter:
mov r6, r0 @ save the opcode
emulate:
ldr r1, [sp, #S_PSR] @ fetch the PSR
- bl checkCondition @ check the condition
- cmp r0, #0 @ r0 = 0 ==> condition failed
+ bl arm_check_condition @ check the condition
+ cmp r0, #ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS @ condition passed?
@ if condition code failed to match, next insn
- beq next @ get the next instruction;
+ bne next @ get the next instruction;
mov r0, r6 @ prepare for EmulateAll()
bl EmulateAll @ emulate the instruction
diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.c b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.c
index 922b811..ff98346 100644
--- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.c
+++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.c
@@ -61,29 +61,3 @@ const float32 float32Constant[] = {
0x41200000 /* single 10.0 */
};
-/* condition code lookup table
- index into the table is test code: EQ, NE, ... LT, GT, AL, NV
- bit position in short is condition code: NZCV */
-static const unsigned short aCC[16] = {
- 0xF0F0, // EQ == Z set
- 0x0F0F, // NE
- 0xCCCC, // CS == C set
- 0x3333, // CC
- 0xFF00, // MI == N set
- 0x00FF, // PL
- 0xAAAA, // VS == V set
- 0x5555, // VC
- 0x0C0C, // HI == C set && Z clear
- 0xF3F3, // LS == C clear || Z set
- 0xAA55, // GE == (N==V)
- 0x55AA, // LT == (N!=V)
- 0x0A05, // GT == (!Z && (N==V))
- 0xF5FA, // LE == (Z || (N!=V))
- 0xFFFF, // AL always
- 0 // NV
-};
-
-unsigned int checkCondition(const unsigned int opcode, const unsigned int ccodes)
-{
- return (aCC[opcode >> 28] >> (ccodes >> 28)) & 1;
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h
index 786e4c9..78f02db 100644
--- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h
+++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h
@@ -475,9 +475,6 @@ static inline unsigned int getDestinationSize(const unsigned int opcode)
return (nRc);
}
-extern unsigned int checkCondition(const unsigned int opcode,
- const unsigned int ccodes);
-
extern const float64 float64Constant[];
extern const float32 float32Constant[];
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for nwfpe.
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for nwfpe Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-10 13:21 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2011-12-10 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 06:54:40PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This patch changes the nwfpe implementation to use the new generic
> ARM instruction set condition code checks, rather than a local
> implementation. It also removes the existing condition code checking,
> which has been used for the generic support (in kernel/opcodes.{ch}).
>
> This code has not been tested beyond building, linking and booting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/nwfpe/entry.S | 8 +++++---
> arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.c | 26 --------------------------
> arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] Add condition code checking to SWP emulation handler.
2011-12-09 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code check v3 Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for nwfpe Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-09 18:54 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 13:22 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes Leif Lindholm
3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Leif Lindholm @ 2011-12-09 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch fixes two separate issues with the SWP emulation handler:
1: Certain processors implementing ARMv7-A can (legally) take an
undef exception even when the condition code would have meant that
the instruction should not have been executed.
2: Opcodes with all flags set (condition code = 0xf) have been reused
in recent, and not-so-recent, versions of the ARM architecture to
implement unconditional extensions to the instruction set. The
existing code would still have processed any undefs triggered by
executing an opcode with such a value.
This patch uses the new generic ARM instruction set condition code
checks to implement proper handling of these situations.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
index 5f452f8..df74518 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <asm/opcodes.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -185,6 +186,21 @@ static int swp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS, 1, regs, regs->ARM_pc);
+ res = arm_check_condition(instr, regs->ARM_cpsr);
+ switch (res) {
+ case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS:
+ break;
+ case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL:
+ /* Condition failed - return to next instruction */
+ regs->ARM_pc += 4;
+ return 0;
+ case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND:
+ /* If unconditional encoding - not a SWP, undef */
+ return -EFAULT;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (current->pid != previous_pid) {
pr_debug("\"%s\" (%ld) uses deprecated SWP{B} instruction\n",
current->comm, (unsigned long)current->pid);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/4] Add condition code checking to SWP emulation handler.
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] Add condition code checking to SWP emulation handler Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-10 13:22 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2011-12-10 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 06:54:57PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This patch fixes two separate issues with the SWP emulation handler:
> 1: Certain processors implementing ARMv7-A can (legally) take an
> undef exception even when the condition code would have meant that
> the instruction should not have been executed.
> 2: Opcodes with all flags set (condition code = 0xf) have been reused
> in recent, and not-so-recent, versions of the ARM architecture to
> implement unconditional extensions to the instruction set. The
> existing code would still have processed any undefs triggered by
> executing an opcode with such a value.
>
> This patch uses the new generic ARM instruction set condition code
> checks to implement proper handling of these situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes.
2011-12-09 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code check v3 Leif Lindholm
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] Add condition code checking to SWP emulation handler Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-09 18:55 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 9:19 ` Tixy
2011-12-10 13:24 ` Will Deacon
3 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Leif Lindholm @ 2011-12-09 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch changes the kprobes implementation to use the generic ARM
instruction set condition code checks, rather than a dedicated
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
---
Tixy's ACK removed as patch modified.
arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c | 66 ++++------------------------------------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
index e17cdd6..1862d8f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
@@ -202,6 +202,8 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <asm/opcodes.h>
+
#include "kprobes.h"
#include "kprobes-test.h"
@@ -1050,65 +1052,9 @@ static int test_instance;
static unsigned long test_check_cc(int cc, unsigned long cpsr)
{
- unsigned long temp;
-
- switch (cc) {
- case 0x0: /* eq */
- return cpsr & PSR_Z_BIT;
-
- case 0x1: /* ne */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_Z_BIT;
-
- case 0x2: /* cs */
- return cpsr & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0x3: /* cc */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0x4: /* mi */
- return cpsr & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0x5: /* pl */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0x6: /* vs */
- return cpsr & PSR_V_BIT;
-
- case 0x7: /* vc */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_V_BIT;
+ int ret = arm_check_condition(cc << 28, cpsr);
- case 0x8: /* hi */
- cpsr &= ~(cpsr >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
- return cpsr & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0x9: /* ls */
- cpsr &= ~(cpsr >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0xa: /* ge */
- cpsr ^= (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xb: /* lt */
- cpsr ^= (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- return cpsr & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xc: /* gt */
- temp = cpsr ^ (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- temp |= (cpsr << 1); /* PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
- return (~temp) & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xd: /* le */
- temp = cpsr ^ (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- temp |= (cpsr << 1); /* PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
- return temp & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xe: /* al */
- case 0xf: /* unconditional */
- return true;
- }
- BUG();
- return false;
+ return (ret != ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL);
}
static int is_last_scenario;
@@ -1128,7 +1074,9 @@ static unsigned long test_context_cpsr(int scenario)
if (!test_case_is_thumb) {
/* Testing ARM code */
- probe_should_run = test_check_cc(current_instruction >> 28, cpsr) != 0;
+ int cc = current_instruction >> 28;
+
+ probe_should_run = test_check_cc(cc, cpsr) != 0;
if (scenario == 15)
is_last_scenario = true;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes.
2011-12-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-10 9:19 ` Tixy
2011-12-10 13:24 ` Will Deacon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tixy @ 2011-12-10 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 18:55 +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This patch changes the kprobes implementation to use the generic ARM
> instruction set condition code checks, rather than a dedicated
> implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@yxit.co.uk>
> ---
> Tixy's ACK removed as patch modified.
>
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c | 66 ++++------------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> index e17cdd6..1862d8f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,8 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/kprobes.h>
>
> +#include <asm/opcodes.h>
> +
> #include "kprobes.h"
> #include "kprobes-test.h"
>
> @@ -1050,65 +1052,9 @@ static int test_instance;
>
> static unsigned long test_check_cc(int cc, unsigned long cpsr)
> {
> - unsigned long temp;
> -
> - switch (cc) {
> - case 0x0: /* eq */
> - return cpsr & PSR_Z_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x1: /* ne */
> - return (~cpsr) & PSR_Z_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x2: /* cs */
> - return cpsr & PSR_C_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x3: /* cc */
> - return (~cpsr) & PSR_C_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x4: /* mi */
> - return cpsr & PSR_N_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x5: /* pl */
> - return (~cpsr) & PSR_N_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x6: /* vs */
> - return cpsr & PSR_V_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x7: /* vc */
> - return (~cpsr) & PSR_V_BIT;
> + int ret = arm_check_condition(cc << 28, cpsr);
>
> - case 0x8: /* hi */
> - cpsr &= ~(cpsr >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
> - return cpsr & PSR_C_BIT;
> -
> - case 0x9: /* ls */
> - cpsr &= ~(cpsr >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
> - return (~cpsr) & PSR_C_BIT;
> -
> - case 0xa: /* ge */
> - cpsr ^= (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> - return (~cpsr) & PSR_N_BIT;
> -
> - case 0xb: /* lt */
> - cpsr ^= (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> - return cpsr & PSR_N_BIT;
> -
> - case 0xc: /* gt */
> - temp = cpsr ^ (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> - temp |= (cpsr << 1); /* PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
> - return (~temp) & PSR_N_BIT;
> -
> - case 0xd: /* le */
> - temp = cpsr ^ (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
> - temp |= (cpsr << 1); /* PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
> - return temp & PSR_N_BIT;
> -
> - case 0xe: /* al */
> - case 0xf: /* unconditional */
> - return true;
> - }
> - BUG();
> - return false;
> + return (ret != ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL);
> }
>
> static int is_last_scenario;
> @@ -1128,7 +1074,9 @@ static unsigned long test_context_cpsr(int scenario)
>
> if (!test_case_is_thumb) {
> /* Testing ARM code */
> - probe_should_run = test_check_cc(current_instruction >> 28, cpsr) != 0;
> + int cc = current_instruction >> 28;
> +
> + probe_should_run = test_check_cc(cc, cpsr) != 0;
> if (scenario == 15)
> is_last_scenario = true;
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes.
2011-12-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 9:19 ` Tixy
@ 2011-12-10 13:24 ` Will Deacon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2011-12-10 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 06:55:44PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This patch changes the kprobes implementation to use the generic ARM
> instruction set condition code checks, rather than a dedicated
> implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
> ---
> Tixy's ACK removed as patch modified.
>
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c | 66 ++++------------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
This looks good to me. Given that Tixy's re-acked it, my reviewed-by is fairly
worthless, but here it is anyway (take it or leave it!):
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-12-08 17:31 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code check Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-08 17:31 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 15:36 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Leif Lindholm @ 2011-12-08 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch breaks the ARM condition checking code out of nwfpe/fpopcode.{ch}
into a standalone file for opcode operations. It also modifies the code
somewhat for coding style adherence, and adds some temporary variables for
increased readability.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h | 20 ++++++++++++
arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..aea97bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
+#define __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
+#endif
+
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL 0
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS 1
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND 2
+
+#endif /* __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
index 16eed6a..43b740d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
# Object file lists.
-obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \
+obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o opcodes.o \
process.o ptrace.o return_address.o setup.o signal.o \
sys_arm.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad966fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * linux/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
+ *
+ * A32 condition code lookup feature moved from nwfpe/fpopcode.c
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/opcodes.h>
+
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
+
+/*
+ * condition code lookup table
+ * index into the table is test code: EQ, NE, ... LT, GT, AL, NV
+ *
+ * bit position in short is condition code: NZCV
+ */
+static const unsigned short cc_map[16] = {
+ 0xF0F0, /* EQ == Z set */
+ 0x0F0F, /* NE */
+ 0xCCCC, /* CS == C set */
+ 0x3333, /* CC */
+ 0xFF00, /* MI == N set */
+ 0x00FF, /* PL */
+ 0xAAAA, /* VS == V set */
+ 0x5555, /* VC */
+ 0x0C0C, /* HI == C set && Z clear */
+ 0xF3F3, /* LS == C clear || Z set */
+ 0xAA55, /* GE == (N==V) */
+ 0x55AA, /* LT == (N!=V) */
+ 0x0A05, /* GT == (!Z && (N==V)) */
+ 0xF5FA, /* LE == (Z || (N!=V)) */
+ 0xFFFF, /* AL always */
+ 0 /* NV */
+};
+
+/*
+ * Returns:
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL - if condition fails
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS - if condition passes (including AL)
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND - if NV condition, or separate unconditional
+ * opcode space from v5 onwards
+ *
+ * Code that tests whether a conditional instruction would pass its condition
+ * check should check that return value == ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS.
+ *
+ * Code that tests if a condition means that the instruction would be executed
+ * (regardless of conditional or unconditional) should instead check that the
+ * return value != ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL.
+ */
+unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr)
+{
+ unsigned int cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
+ unsigned int psr_cond = psr >> 28;
+
+ if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
+ if ((cc_map[cc_bits] >> (psr_cond)) & 1)
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
+ else
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
+ } else {
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_check_condition);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-12-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-12-09 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 17:50 ` Leif Lindholm
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2011-12-09 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Leif,
This looks largely there, but I have some small comments inline.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:31:43PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..aea97bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +#define __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
> +#endif
You could use u32 for the parameters to reinforce the point that they're
words.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ad966fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> + *
> + * A32 condition code lookup feature moved from nwfpe/fpopcode.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <asm/opcodes.h>
> +
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
> +
> +/*
> + * condition code lookup table
> + * index into the table is test code: EQ, NE, ... LT, GT, AL, NV
> + *
> + * bit position in short is condition code: NZCV
> + */
> +static const unsigned short cc_map[16] = {
> + 0xF0F0, /* EQ == Z set */
> + 0x0F0F, /* NE */
> + 0xCCCC, /* CS == C set */
> + 0x3333, /* CC */
> + 0xFF00, /* MI == N set */
> + 0x00FF, /* PL */
> + 0xAAAA, /* VS == V set */
> + 0x5555, /* VC */
> + 0x0C0C, /* HI == C set && Z clear */
> + 0xF3F3, /* LS == C clear || Z set */
> + 0xAA55, /* GE == (N==V) */
> + 0x55AA, /* LT == (N!=V) */
> + 0x0A05, /* GT == (!Z && (N==V)) */
> + 0xF5FA, /* LE == (Z || (N!=V)) */
> + 0xFFFF, /* AL always */
> + 0 /* NV */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Returns:
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL - if condition fails
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS - if condition passes (including AL)
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND - if NV condition, or separate unconditional
> + * opcode space from v5 onwards
> + *
> + * Code that tests whether a conditional instruction would pass its condition
> + * check should check that return value == ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS.
> + *
> + * Code that tests if a condition means that the instruction would be executed
> + * (regardless of conditional or unconditional) should instead check that the
> + * return value != ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL.
> + */
> +unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr)
I think you want asmlinkage for this function.
> +{
> + unsigned int cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
> + unsigned int psr_cond = psr >> 28;
> +
> + if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
> + if ((cc_map[cc_bits] >> (psr_cond)) & 1)
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
> + else
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
> + } else {
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
> + }
> +}
Maybe have a single return here returning a ret value which you assign in
the conditional blocks.
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_check_condition);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-12-09 15:36 ` Will Deacon
@ 2011-12-09 17:50 ` Leif Lindholm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Leif Lindholm @ 2011-12-09 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 12/09/11 15:36, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Leif,
>
> This looks largely there, but I have some small comments inline.
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:31:43PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> +extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
>> +#endif
>
> You could use u32 for the parameters to reinforce the point that they're
> words.
Yeah, fair point. I just kept the types from the original nwfpe code.
>> +unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr)
>
> I think you want asmlinkage for this function.
OK
>> +{
>> + unsigned int cc_bits = opcode>> 28;
>> + unsigned int psr_cond = psr>> 28;
>> +
>> + if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
>> + if ((cc_map[cc_bits]>> (psr_cond))& 1)
>> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
>> + else
>> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
>> + } else {
>> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Maybe have a single return here returning a ret value which you assign in
> the conditional blocks.
OK
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_check_condition);
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
OK
/
Leif
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-11-25 17:19 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA " Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-11-25 17:19 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-11-25 17:38 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-30 16:59 ` Dave Martin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Leif Lindholm @ 2011-11-25 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch breaks the ARM condition checking code out of nwfpe/fpopcode.{ch}
into a standalone file for opcode operations. It also modifies the code
somewhat for coding style adherence, and adds some temporary variables for
increased readability.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h | 20 ++++++++++++
arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..aea97bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
+#define __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
+#endif
+
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL 0
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS 1
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND 2
+
+#endif /* __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
index 16eed6a..43b740d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
# Object file lists.
-obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \
+obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o opcodes.o \
process.o ptrace.o return_address.o setup.o signal.o \
sys_arm.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c3171cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * linux/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
+ *
+ * A32 condition code lookup feature moved from nwfpe/fpopcode.c
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/opcodes.h>
+
+#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
+
+/*
+ * condition code lookup table
+ * index into the table is test code: EQ, NE, ... LT, GT, AL, NV
+ *
+ * bit position in short is condition code: NZCV
+ */
+static const unsigned short cc_map[16] = {
+ 0xF0F0, /* EQ == Z set */
+ 0x0F0F, /* NE */
+ 0xCCCC, /* CS == C set */
+ 0x3333, /* CC */
+ 0xFF00, /* MI == N set */
+ 0x00FF, /* PL */
+ 0xAAAA, /* VS == V set */
+ 0x5555, /* VC */
+ 0x0C0C, /* HI == C set && Z clear */
+ 0xF3F3, /* LS == C clear || Z set */
+ 0xAA55, /* GE == (N==V) */
+ 0x55AA, /* LT == (N!=V) */
+ 0x0A05, /* GT == (!Z && (N==V)) */
+ 0xF5FA, /* LE == (Z || (N!=V)) */
+ 0xFFFF, /* AL always */
+ 0 /* NV */
+};
+
+/*
+ * Returns:
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL - if condition fails
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS - if condition passes (including AL)
+ * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND - if NV condition, or separate unconditional
+ * opcode space from v5 onwards
+ *
+ * Code that needs to check whether a condition has explicitly passed,
+ * should compare the return value to 1.
+ * Code that wants to check if a condition means that the instruction
+ * should be executed, should compare the return value to !0.
+ */
+unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr)
+{
+ unsigned int cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
+ unsigned int psr_cond = psr >> 28;
+
+ if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
+ if ((cc_map[cc_bits] >> (psr_cond)) & 1)
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
+ else
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
+ } else {
+ return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
+ }
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_check_condition);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-11-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set " Leif Lindholm
@ 2011-11-25 17:38 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-30 16:59 ` Dave Martin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Dave Martin @ 2011-11-25 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:19:23PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This patch breaks the ARM condition checking code out of nwfpe/fpopcode.{ch}
> into a standalone file for opcode operations. It also modifies the code
> somewhat for coding style adherence, and adds some temporary variables for
> increased readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
Heh, looks like I also invented the same header file in the meantime
Would you be able to comment on this?
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/141568
I think the content is complementary to what you're proposing.
Cheers
---Dave
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h | 20 ++++++++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..aea97bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +#define __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
> +#endif
> +
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL 0
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS 1
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND 2
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> index 16eed6a..43b740d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
>
> # Object file lists.
>
> -obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \
> +obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o opcodes.o \
> process.o ptrace.o return_address.o setup.o signal.o \
> sys_arm.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c3171cc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> + *
> + * A32 condition code lookup feature moved from nwfpe/fpopcode.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <asm/opcodes.h>
> +
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
> +
> +/*
> + * condition code lookup table
> + * index into the table is test code: EQ, NE, ... LT, GT, AL, NV
> + *
> + * bit position in short is condition code: NZCV
> + */
> +static const unsigned short cc_map[16] = {
> + 0xF0F0, /* EQ == Z set */
> + 0x0F0F, /* NE */
> + 0xCCCC, /* CS == C set */
> + 0x3333, /* CC */
> + 0xFF00, /* MI == N set */
> + 0x00FF, /* PL */
> + 0xAAAA, /* VS == V set */
> + 0x5555, /* VC */
> + 0x0C0C, /* HI == C set && Z clear */
> + 0xF3F3, /* LS == C clear || Z set */
> + 0xAA55, /* GE == (N==V) */
> + 0x55AA, /* LT == (N!=V) */
> + 0x0A05, /* GT == (!Z && (N==V)) */
> + 0xF5FA, /* LE == (Z || (N!=V)) */
> + 0xFFFF, /* AL always */
> + 0 /* NV */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Returns:
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL - if condition fails
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS - if condition passes (including AL)
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND - if NV condition, or separate unconditional
> + * opcode space from v5 onwards
> + *
> + * Code that needs to check whether a condition has explicitly passed,
> + * should compare the return value to 1.
> + * Code that wants to check if a condition means that the instruction
> + * should be executed, should compare the return value to !0.
> + */
> +unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr)
> +{
> + unsigned int cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
> + unsigned int psr_cond = psr >> 28;
> +
> + if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
> + if ((cc_map[cc_bits] >> (psr_cond)) & 1)
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
> + else
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
> + } else {
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_check_condition);
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks.
2011-11-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set " Leif Lindholm
2011-11-25 17:38 ` Dave Martin
@ 2011-11-30 16:59 ` Dave Martin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Dave Martin @ 2011-11-30 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:19:23PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> This patch breaks the ARM condition checking code out of nwfpe/fpopcode.{ch}
> into a standalone file for opcode operations. It also modifies the code
> somewhat for coding style adherence, and adds some temporary variables for
> increased readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h | 20 ++++++++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..aea97bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/include/asm/opcodes.h
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +#define __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +extern unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr);
> +#endif
> +
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL 0
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS 1
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND 2
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_ARM_OPCODES_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> index 16eed6a..43b740d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
>
> # Object file lists.
>
> -obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \
> +obj-y := elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o opcodes.o \
> process.o ptrace.o return_address.o setup.o signal.o \
> sys_arm.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c3171cc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/arch/arm/kernel/opcodes.c
> + *
> + * A32 condition code lookup feature moved from nwfpe/fpopcode.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <asm/opcodes.h>
> +
> +#define ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND 0xf
> +
> +/*
> + * condition code lookup table
> + * index into the table is test code: EQ, NE, ... LT, GT, AL, NV
> + *
> + * bit position in short is condition code: NZCV
> + */
> +static const unsigned short cc_map[16] = {
> + 0xF0F0, /* EQ == Z set */
> + 0x0F0F, /* NE */
> + 0xCCCC, /* CS == C set */
> + 0x3333, /* CC */
> + 0xFF00, /* MI == N set */
> + 0x00FF, /* PL */
> + 0xAAAA, /* VS == V set */
> + 0x5555, /* VC */
> + 0x0C0C, /* HI == C set && Z clear */
> + 0xF3F3, /* LS == C clear || Z set */
> + 0xAA55, /* GE == (N==V) */
> + 0x55AA, /* LT == (N!=V) */
> + 0x0A05, /* GT == (!Z && (N==V)) */
> + 0xF5FA, /* LE == (Z || (N!=V)) */
> + 0xFFFF, /* AL always */
> + 0 /* NV */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Returns:
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL - if condition fails
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS - if condition passes (including AL)
> + * ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND - if NV condition, or separate unconditional
> + * opcode space from v5 onwards
> + *
> + * Code that needs to check whether a condition has explicitly passed,
> + * should compare the return value to 1.
This paragraph should refer to the symbolic constants -- there's not so
much point having them if people hard-code integer comparisons into all
the calling code.
The wording feels a bit confusing too. Maybe something like:
"Code that needs to check when an instruction is conditional and would
pass its condition check should check whether the return value ==
ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS."
> + * Code that wants to check if a condition means that the instruction
> + * should be executed, should compare the return value to !0.
!0 == 1. I guess this is not what you mean.
Maybe:
"Code that needs to check when an instruction would architecturally
execute (including some instructions on ARMv5 and later which cannot be
conditional) should check whether the return value !=
ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL."
This documentation should perhaps move to opcodes.h, but I don't have a
strong opinion.
> + */
> +unsigned int arm_check_condition(unsigned int opcode, unsigned int psr)
> +{
> + unsigned int cc_bits = opcode >> 28;
> + unsigned int psr_cond = psr >> 28;
> +
> + if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
> + if ((cc_map[cc_bits] >> (psr_cond)) & 1)
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
> + else
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
> + } else {
Remove the space before } (checkpatch.pl ought to pick this up)
> + return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_check_condition);
Cheers
---Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread