From: leif.lindholm@arm.com (Leif Lindholm)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes.
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:55:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111209185503.19655.37484.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111209185302.19655.36481.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
This patch changes the kprobes implementation to use the generic ARM
instruction set condition code checks, rather than a dedicated
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com>
---
Tixy's ACK removed as patch modified.
arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c | 66 ++++------------------------------------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
index e17cdd6..1862d8f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
@@ -202,6 +202,8 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <asm/opcodes.h>
+
#include "kprobes.h"
#include "kprobes-test.h"
@@ -1050,65 +1052,9 @@ static int test_instance;
static unsigned long test_check_cc(int cc, unsigned long cpsr)
{
- unsigned long temp;
-
- switch (cc) {
- case 0x0: /* eq */
- return cpsr & PSR_Z_BIT;
-
- case 0x1: /* ne */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_Z_BIT;
-
- case 0x2: /* cs */
- return cpsr & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0x3: /* cc */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0x4: /* mi */
- return cpsr & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0x5: /* pl */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0x6: /* vs */
- return cpsr & PSR_V_BIT;
-
- case 0x7: /* vc */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_V_BIT;
+ int ret = arm_check_condition(cc << 28, cpsr);
- case 0x8: /* hi */
- cpsr &= ~(cpsr >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
- return cpsr & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0x9: /* ls */
- cpsr &= ~(cpsr >> 1); /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_C_BIT;
-
- case 0xa: /* ge */
- cpsr ^= (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- return (~cpsr) & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xb: /* lt */
- cpsr ^= (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- return cpsr & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xc: /* gt */
- temp = cpsr ^ (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- temp |= (cpsr << 1); /* PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
- return (~temp) & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xd: /* le */
- temp = cpsr ^ (cpsr << 3); /* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
- temp |= (cpsr << 1); /* PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
- return temp & PSR_N_BIT;
-
- case 0xe: /* al */
- case 0xf: /* unconditional */
- return true;
- }
- BUG();
- return false;
+ return (ret != ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL);
}
static int is_last_scenario;
@@ -1128,7 +1074,9 @@ static unsigned long test_context_cpsr(int scenario)
if (!test_case_is_thumb) {
/* Testing ARM code */
- probe_should_run = test_check_cc(current_instruction >> 28, cpsr) != 0;
+ int cc = current_instruction >> 28;
+
+ probe_should_run = test_check_cc(cc, cpsr) != 0;
if (scenario == 15)
is_last_scenario = true;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 18:54 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code check v3 Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add generic ARM instruction set condition code checks Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 13:20 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for nwfpe Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 18:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] Add condition code checking to SWP emulation handler Leif Lindholm
2011-12-10 13:22 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 18:55 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2011-12-10 9:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes Tixy
2011-12-10 13:24 ` Will Deacon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-08 17:31 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code check Leif Lindholm
2011-12-08 17:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 16:17 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 16:40 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-09 17:48 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 18:05 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2011-12-09 18:26 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-12-09 18:26 ` Leif Lindholm
2011-11-25 17:19 [PATCH 0/4] Add generic ARM ISA condition code checks Leif Lindholm
2011-11-25 17:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] Use generic ARM instruction set condition code checks for kprobes Leif Lindholm
2011-11-27 12:24 ` Tixy
2011-11-30 17:02 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111209185503.19655.37484.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=leif.lindholm@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).