linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: sched_clock: allow sched_clock to be selected at runtime
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:46:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111213004656.GR32251@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE63459.1030105@arm.com>

* Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> [111212 08:33]:
> On 12/12/11 03:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 12/09/2011 09:33 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> sched_clock() is yet another blocker on the road to the single
> >> image. This patch implements an idea by Russell King:
> >>
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg49561.html
> >>
> >> Instead of asking the platform to implement both sched_clock()
> >> itself and the rollover callback, simply register a read()
> >> function, and let the ARM code care about sched_clock() itself,
> >> the conversion to ns and the rollover. sched_clock() uses
> >> this read() function as an indirection to the platform code.
> >> If the platform doesn't provide a read(), the code falls back
> >> to the jiffy counter (just like the default sched_clock).
> >>
> >> This allow some simplifications and possibly some footprint gain
> >> when multiple platforms are compiled in. Among the drawbacks,
> >> the removal of the *_fixed_sched_clock optimization which could
> >> negatively impact some platforms (sa1100, tegra, versatile
> >> and omap).
> >>
> >> Tested on 11MPCore, OMAP4 and Tegra.
> >>
> >> Cc: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org>
> >> Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
> >> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
> >> Cc: Erik Gilling <konkers@android.com>
> >> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> >> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> >> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
> >> Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@unipv.it>
> >> Cc: STEricsson <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com>
> >> Cc: Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@wantstofly.org>
> >> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
> >> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> >> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> >> Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
> >> Tested-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
> >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >> I'm reposting this patch with the hope that it (or Russell's
> >> alternative patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115961/)
> >> will get merged in 3.3. It doesn't look intrusive enough to be
> >> left on the side of the road for yet another cycle...
> >>
> > 
> > Please! I've been holding off on (re)doing and submitting sched_clock
> > support for highbank until this goes in.
> 
> Queued as patch 7205/1.
> 
> 	M.

Great, seems to boot fine on all omaps I tried, will go ack it
in the patch system.

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-13  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-09 15:33 [PATCH v4] ARM: sched_clock: allow sched_clock to be selected at runtime Marc Zyngier
2011-12-09 22:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-12  3:57 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-12 17:05   ` Marc Zyngier
2011-12-13  0:46     ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-12-13  0:50       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-13  1:33         ` Kyungmin Park
2011-12-13 18:58           ` Marc Zyngier
2011-12-13 21:16             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-14 22:07               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-15 10:47                 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-12-13 13:22 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-12-15  1:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-12-15  1:56 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-12-15 11:04   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111213004656.GR32251@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).