From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] s3c-hsudc: add a remove function
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:44:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112181444.39812.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111218081048.GS14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 09:10:48 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > As the driver is also buildable as a module it should need
> > a cleanup function for the removal of the module.
>
> My guess is that this wasn't implemented because of the embedded struct
> device lifetime rules for the gadget - to prevent the unbinding of the
> driver.
>
> Until the struct device lifetime gets fixed, you must not allow the module
> nor the data structure containing the struct device to be freed.
I understand where this problem comes from (the release method is potentially
gone with the module before it is called) but after more reading, I have a
hard time believing that a lot of the other gadget drivers would be wrong as
well. Some of them since 2009 or possibly earlier.
Gadgets with embedded release methods: langwell_udc, goku_udc, fsl_qe_udc (and
fsl_udc_core), amd5536udc, net2280, pch_udc, cil13xxx_udc, dummy_hcd,
omap_udc, net2272, mc_udc_core
Gadgets which use the release method from its pdev->dev but also free the
struct with the gadget in their remove method: r8a66597-udc, m66592-udc,
fusb300_udc. (possibly before the release function is called)
On the other hand, the gets and puts of the udc->gadget.dev should be paired
correctly and it's only an intermediate device between the udc and the gadget
driver, so that the call to device_unregister in the remove method should put
the refcount to 0 and thus init the cleanup (including the call to release)
before the module is removed.
So, I am very confused :-).
Heiko
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/usb/gadget/s3c-hsudc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c-hsudc.c
> > b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c-hsudc.c index 3e5673d..7cb0850 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c-hsudc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/s3c-hsudc.c
> >
> > @@ -1370,12 +1370,37 @@ err_res:
> > return ret;
> >
> > }
> >
> > +static int __devexit s3c_hsudc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct s3c_hsudc *hsudc = the_controller;
> > +
> > + usb_del_gadget_udc(&hsudc->gadget);
> > +
> > + clk_disable(hsudc->uclk);
> > + clk_put(hsudc->uclk);
> > +
> > + free_irq(hsudc->irq, hsudc);
> > +
> > + iounmap(hsudc->regs);
> > +
> > + release_resource(hsudc->mem_rsrc);
> > + kfree(hsudc->mem_rsrc);
> > +
> > + if (hsudc->transceiver)
> > + otg_put_transceiver(hsudc->transceiver);
> > +
> > + the_controller = NULL;
> > + kfree(hsudc);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >
> > static struct platform_driver s3c_hsudc_driver = {
> >
> > .driver = {
> >
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > .name = "s3c-hsudc",
> >
> > },
> > .probe = s3c_hsudc_probe,
> >
> > + .remove = __devexit_p(s3c_hsudc_remove),
> >
> > };
> >
> > module_platform_driver(s3c_hsudc_driver);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-18 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-17 19:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] s3c-hsudc: regulator handling and a lot of fixes Heiko Stübner
2011-12-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] s3c-hsudc: move platform_data struct to global header Heiko Stübner
2011-12-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] s3c-hsudc: add __devinit to probe function Heiko Stübner
2011-12-17 19:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] s3c-hsudc: add a remove function Heiko Stübner
2011-12-18 8:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-18 8:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-18 9:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2011-12-18 13:44 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2011-12-18 14:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-18 18:50 ` Heiko Stübner
2011-12-18 19:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-18 19:33 ` Heiko Stübner
2011-12-18 19:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-18 20:24 ` Heiko Stübner
2011-12-18 20:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-18 20:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2011-12-18 21:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-20 6:08 ` Greg KH
2011-12-20 6:07 ` Greg KH
2011-12-17 19:27 ` [PATCH 4/7] s3c-hsudc: add missing otg_put_transceiver in probe Heiko Stübner
2011-12-17 19:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] s3c-hsudc: move device registration to probe and remove Heiko Stübner
2011-12-18 8:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-17 19:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] s3c-hsudc: use udc_start and udc_stop functions Heiko Stübner
2011-12-17 19:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] s3c-hsudc: Add regulator handling Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112181444.39812.heiko@sntech.de \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).