From: mgherzan@gmail.com (Mircea Gherzan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: net: JIT compiler for packet filters
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:14:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111219171401.GA1732@swarm.cs.pub.ro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111219155252.GG2031@linaro.org>
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:52:52PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:33:38PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:19:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:50:21PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:40:30AM +0100, Mircea Gherzan wrote:
> > > > > > Based of Matt Evans's PPC64 implementation.
> > > > > Note that it's fine to have the JIT generating ARM code, even if the rest
> > > > > if the kernel is Thumb-2. This would only start to cause problems if we
> > > > > want to do things like set kprobes in the JITted code, or unwind out of
> > > > > the JITted code.
> > > > or use a CPU that doesn't speak ARM (e.g. v7M)
> > >
> > > Indeed... I was assuming though that that would be out of scope for the
> > > first iteration of this code.
> > Right, depending on !THUMB2 is fine. Only generating ARM code with
> > THUMB2=y is not.
>
> The kernel doesn't support v7-M upstream though. CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y
> doesn't mean that there is no ARM code present -- there _is_ ARM code in
> the kernel image even with this option (though not very much).
What about relying at runtime on bits[3:0] of ID_PFR0? And this only for
ARMv7.
Are there any other ARM cores of interest that do _not_ support the ARM
instruction set?
Thanks,
Mircea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 8:40 [PATCH v2] ARM: net: JIT compiler for packet filters Mircea Gherzan
2011-12-19 12:50 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-19 15:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-19 15:24 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-19 15:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-19 15:52 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-19 17:14 ` Mircea Gherzan [this message]
2011-12-19 17:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-12-19 16:45 ` Mircea Gherzan
2011-12-19 18:18 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-19 18:29 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-21 14:59 ` Mircea Gherzan
2011-12-22 17:00 ` Dave Martin
2011-12-22 17:34 ` David Laight
2011-12-23 2:26 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111219171401.GA1732@swarm.cs.pub.ro \
--to=mgherzan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).