From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:29:03 +0000
Subject: [GIT PULL] imx: gpio interrupt cleanup
In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF176BE92A13@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
References: <20111208143204.GA8139@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
 <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF176BE92A13@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20111219172903.GK2351@totoro>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:20:34AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Behalf Of Shawn Guo wrote at Thursday, December 08, 2011 7:32 AM:
> > Hi Arnd and  Olof,
> > 
> > Please consider to pull the series below.  I really should have
> > Thomas' ack on Jamie's patch 'irqdomain: export irq_domain_simple_ops
> > for !CONFIG_OF', and Grant's ack on patch 'gpio/mxc: adopt irq_domain
> > in gpio driver'.  So this pull request is also asking comments for the
> > path of these patches.
> > 
> > Thomas, Grant,
> > 
> > Please speak up if you do not want "your" patches to go through arm-soc
> > tree.  Thanks.
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> I'm waiting on the following patch, since I need it to complete a patch
> I'm working on:
> 
> > Jamie Iles (1):
> >       irqdomain: export irq_domain_simple_ops for !CONFIG_OF
> 
> Can you ack it for inclusion in the arm-soc tree, or apply it, so I know
> it's OK to rely on this patch in my work?

Thomas has acked this and it's in Russell's tracker as 7235/1 as I have 
a VIC patch that uses it too.

Jamie