linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/15] ARM: local timers: allow smp_twd to be used standalone
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:38:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111222203828.GP2577@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324574865-5367-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:27:31PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +	twd_clock_event	= alloc_percpu(struct clock_event_device);
> +	if (!twd_base || !twd_clock_event) {
> +		iounmap(twd_base);
> +		twd_base = NULL;
> +		free_percpu(twd_clock_event);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Immediately configure the timer on the boot CPU */
> +	clk = per_cpu_ptr(twd_clock_event, smp_processor_id());
> +	twd_setup(clk);

This is insufficient.  A proper local timer has this:

	evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
	evt->broadcast = smp_timer_broadcast;

as well as all the rest of the normal clock event stuff.  The broadcast
callback is used when the timer core wants to broadcast the timer tick
to other CPUs - see tick_do_broadcast() in kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c.
The selection of which clock event device to use is rather 'optimized'
for current conditions, and registering local timers without this is
likely to oops the kernel at some point.

I don't think you can register separate clock event devices for use as
the broadcast device vs the local timer device.

So, either you _have_ to use the SMP supplied version, or we make the
broadcast function public and have everyone conditionally set that up,
or something else... either way this is getting exceedingly messy.

That's why I believe it's far simpler to just say no to using twd as a
global timer, and just keep it for SMP local timer purposes.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-22 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-22 17:27 [PATCH v2 00/15] Make SMP timers standalone Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] ARM: local timers: allow smp_twd to be used standalone Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 20:38   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] ARM: smp_twd: add device tree support Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] ARM: local timers: switch realview to standalone smp_twd Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] ARM: local timers: switch vexpress " Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] ARM: local timers: remove localtimer.c from plat-versatile Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] ARM: local timers: switch tegra to standalone smp_twd Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 19:22   ` Colin Cross
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] ARM: local timers: switch omap4 " Marc Zyngier
2011-12-23  6:37   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] ARM: local timers: switch shmobile " Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] ARM: local timers: switch ux500 " Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] ARM: local timers: switch highbank " Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] ARM: local timers: switch imx6q " Marc Zyngier
2011-12-25 13:40   ` Shawn Guo
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] ARM: smp_twd: remove support for non-standalone version Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] ARM: local timers: make MCT timer standalone Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] ARM: local timers: make MSM timers standalone Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] ARM: local timers: Remove CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS support Marc Zyngier
2011-12-22 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Make SMP timers standalone Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-04 17:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2012-01-04 21:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-05  0:00       ` Linus Walleij
2012-01-05 11:08         ` Marc Zyngier
2012-01-05 11:13           ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-05 11:19             ` Marc Zyngier
2012-01-05 11:26               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-05 11:35                 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-01-05 12:10                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-05 16:13                     ` Marc Zyngier
2012-01-05 16:26                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-05 16:55                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-05 11:31               ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-05 10:33       ` Marc Zyngier
2012-01-05 10:45         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-05  1:17     ` David Brown
2012-01-05 10:26       ` Linus Walleij
2012-01-05 11:01         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-05 19:34         ` johlstei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111222203828.GP2577@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).