From: rjw@sisk.pl (Rafael J. Wysocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Add OF support
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 20:13:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112262013.19995.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323704789-23923-2-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Hi,
On Monday, December 12, 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> A device node pointer is added to generic pm domain structure to associate
> the domain with a node in the device tree.
That sounds fine except for one thing: PM domains are not devices, so adding
"device node" pointers to them is kind of confusing. Perhaps there should be
something like struct dt_node, representing a more general device tree node?
> The platform code parses the
> device tree to find available nodes representing the generic power domain,
> instantiates the available domains and initializes them by calling
> pm_genpd_init().
>
> Nodes representing the devices include a phandle of the power domain to
> which it belongs. As these devices get instantiated, the driver code
> checkes for availability of a power domain phandle, converts the phandle
> to a device node and uses the new pm_genpd_of_add_device() api to
> associate the device with a power domain.
>
> pm_genpd_of_add_device() runs through its list of registered power domains
> and matches the OF node of the domain with the one specified as the
> parameter. If a match is found, the device is associated with the matched
> domain.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 13 +++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 92e6a90..e895dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -1118,14 +1118,26 @@ static void pm_genpd_complete(struct device *dev)
> * @td: Set of PM QoS timing parameters to attach to the device.
> */
> int __pm_genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
> - struct gpd_timing_data *td)
> + struct gpd_timing_data *td, struct device_node *node)
> {
> struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
> + struct generic_pm_domain *gpd = NULL;
> struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
> int ret = 0;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
> + mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
> + if (node) {
> + list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node) {
> + if (gpd->of_node == node) {
> + genpd = gpd;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
It looks like you might add a wrapper around the original
__pm_genpd_add_device() instead of modifying __pm_genpd_add_device()
itself. That would be a bit cleaner, as your new function is always
called with at least one NULL arg.
> +
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> index a03a0ad..2ce7cc4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> enum gpd_status {
> GPD_STATE_ACTIVE = 0, /* PM domain is active */
> @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ struct generic_pm_domain {
> s64 break_even_ns; /* Power break even for the entire domain. */
> s64 max_off_time_ns; /* Maximum allowed "suspended" time. */
> ktime_t power_off_time;
> + struct device_node *of_node; /* Node in device tree */
That should be initialized by the caller of pm_genpd_init(), right?
> };
>
> static inline struct generic_pm_domain *pd_to_genpd(struct dev_pm_domain *pd)
> @@ -115,12 +117,19 @@ extern struct dev_power_governor simple_qos_governor;
> extern struct generic_pm_domain *dev_to_genpd(struct device *dev);
> extern int __pm_genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> struct device *dev,
> - struct gpd_timing_data *td);
> + struct gpd_timing_data *td,
> + struct device_node *gpd_node);
>
> static inline int pm_genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> - return __pm_genpd_add_device(genpd, dev, NULL);
> + return __pm_genpd_add_device(genpd, dev, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pm_genpd_of_add_device(struct device_node *gpd_node,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return __pm_genpd_add_device(NULL, dev, NULL, gpd_node);
> }
>
> extern int pm_genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-26 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-12 15:46 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: Exynos: Adapt to generic power domain Thomas Abraham
2011-12-12 15:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Add OF support Thomas Abraham
2011-12-12 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Hook up power domains to generic power domain infrastructure Thomas Abraham
2011-12-26 19:06 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-27 22:16 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-12-27 23:14 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-12-28 5:25 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-12-28 11:09 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-12-28 18:58 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-01-02 2:14 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-02 22:19 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-01-03 8:23 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-04 7:00 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-04 7:29 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-12-26 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Add OF support Mark Brown
2011-12-26 19:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-12-26 19:24 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-26 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-28 5:10 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-12-28 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-01-02 3:47 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-03 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-01-05 15:42 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-02 6:59 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-03 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112262013.19995.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).