linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-dt for v3.3
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:33:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112272333.18024.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <087d01ccc1d5$c6aa8300$53ff8900$%kim@samsung.com>

On Saturday 24 December 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
> 
> Please pull the samsung-devel-dt for v3.3.
> It includes support DT for Samsung EXYNOS4. 

Pulled into next/dt, thanks a lot!

Unfortunately, this got two conflicts against "ARM: exynos4: convert to
CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER" from Marc Zyngier, and I suspect my temporary
resolution is incorrect:

--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpu.c
@@@ -206,6 -209,24 +208,13 @@@ void __init exynos4_init_clocks(int xta
        exynos4_setup_clocks();
  }
  
 -static void exynos4_gic_irq_fix_base(struct irq_data *d)
 -{
 -      struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 -
 -      gic_data->cpu_base = S5P_VA_GIC_CPU +
 -                          (gic_bank_offset * smp_processor_id());
 -
 -      gic_data->dist_base = S5P_VA_GIC_DIST +
 -                          (gic_bank_offset * smp_processor_id());
 -}
 -
+ #ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ static const struct of_device_id exynos4_dt_irq_match[] = {
+       { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
+       {},
+ };
+ #endif
+ 
  void __init exynos4_init_irq(void)
  {
        int irq;
@@@ -213,8 -233,17 +222,13 @@@
  
        gic_bank_offset = soc_is_exynos4412() ? 0x4000 : 0x8000;
  
-       gic_init_bases(0, IRQ_PPI(0), S5P_VA_GIC_DIST, S5P_VA_GIC_CPU, gic_bank_offset);
+       if (!of_have_populated_dt())
 -              gic_init(0, IRQ_PPI(0), S5P_VA_GIC_DIST, S5P_VA_GIC_CPU);
++              gic_init_bases(0, IRQ_PPI(0), S5P_VA_GIC_DIST, S5P_VA_GIC_CPU, gic_bank_offset);
+ #ifdef CONFIG_OF
+       else
+               of_irq_init(exynos4_dt_irq_match);
+ #endif
  
 -      gic_arch_extn.irq_eoi = exynos4_gic_irq_fix_base;
 -      gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask = exynos4_gic_irq_fix_base;
 -      gic_arch_extn.irq_mask = exynos4_gic_irq_fix_base;
 -
        for (irq = 0; irq < MAX_COMBINER_NR; irq++) {
  
                combiner_init(irq, (void __iomem *)S5P_VA_COMBINER(irq),


The other conflict was a one-line change from 1fb3726cf3 "ARM: SAMSUNG: Move timer irq
numbers to end of linux irq space" (from Thomas Abraham) in code that was removed
by Marc's patch, so I kept removing that.

Maybe you can do a merge of your branch with Russell's devel-stable branch and tell me
which conflict resolution you would like.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-27 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-24  0:48 [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-dt for v3.3 Kukjin Kim
2011-12-27 23:33 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-12-28  7:59   ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201112272333.18024.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).