From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] MTD/GPMI bugfix : reset the BCH module when it is not MX23
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:01:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112301501.07351.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325233646-3343-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com>
> In MX28, if we do not reset the BCH module. The BCH module may
> becomes unstable when the board reboots for several thousands times.
> This bug has been catched in customer's production.
>
> The patch adds some comments, and fixes it now.
>
> Also change gpmi_reset_block() to static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c index de4db76..1573e99 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static int clear_poll_bit(void __iomem *addr, u32 mask)
> * [1] enable the module.
> * [2] reset the module.
> *
> - * In most of the cases, it's ok. But there is a hardware bug in the BCH
> block. + * In most of the cases, it's ok.
> + * But in MX23, there is a hardware bug in the BCH block.
> * If you try to soft reset the BCH block, it becomes unusable until
> * the next hard reset. This case occurs in the NAND boot mode. When the
> board * boots by NAND, the ROM of the chip will initialize the BCH blocks
> itself. @@ -78,8 +79,10 @@ static int clear_poll_bit(void __iomem *addr,
> u32 mask) *
> * To avoid this bug, just add a new parameter `just_enable` for
> * the mxs_reset_block(), and rewrite it here.
> + *
> + * The bug has been fixed in the following chips, such as MX28.
> */
> -int gpmi_reset_block(void __iomem *reset_addr, bool just_enable)
> +static int gpmi_reset_block(void __iomem *reset_addr, bool just_enable)
> {
> int ret;
> int timeout = 0x400;
> @@ -206,7 +209,8 @@ int bch_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> if (ret)
> goto err_out;
>
> - ret = gpmi_reset_block(r->bch_regs, true);
> + /* The bug only exits in mx23, the following chips fix it. */
> + ret = gpmi_reset_block(r->bch_regs, GPMI_IS_MX23(this));
> if (ret)
> goto err_out;
Looks sane, though I can't test right now.
Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-30 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-30 8:27 [PATCH v2] MTD/GPMI bugfix : reset the BCH module when it is not MX23 Huang Shijie
2011-12-30 14:01 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2011-12-30 14:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-12-31 2:23 ` Huang Shijie
2011-12-31 3:15 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-31 3:31 ` Huang Shijie
2011-12-31 4:45 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-31 15:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-01 15:23 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-01 22:33 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-03 2:30 ` Huang Shijie
2012-01-03 11:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-01-04 2:43 ` Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112301501.07351.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).