From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 08:14:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma: add wmb before enable/run a channel In-Reply-To: <1325388460-20678-1-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> References: <1325388460-20678-1-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120101071425.GA25978@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Richard, On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:27:40AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > dma_alloc_coherent memory may be bufferable. We need to add > nececcary memory barrier. necessary > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao > --- > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > index 2ebb2bc..8cd9492 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c > @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ static int sdma_run_channel(struct sdma_channel *sdmac) > > init_completion(&sdmac->done); > > + wmb(); > __raw_writel(1 << channel, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_START); > > ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sdmac->done, HZ); > @@ -809,6 +810,7 @@ out: > > static void sdma_enable_channel(struct sdma_engine *sdma, int channel) > { > + wmb(); > __raw_writel(1 << channel, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_START); > } I don't know the sdma code very well, but wouldn't it be nice to call sdma_enable_channel() in sdma_run_channel() instead of open coding it? As you probably need some rearrangements to have sdma_enable_channel() declared in sdma_run_channel() this might be better done with a seperate patch. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |