From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Renaming MACH_TYPE_KINETIS_K60 into MACH_TYPE_KINETIS
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 11:03:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120103110337.GM2914@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325065882.1584.153.camel@skywanderer.emcraft.com>
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 01:51:22PM +0400, Alexander Potashev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About three weeks ago I registered a machine type for the Freescale
> Kinetis K60 microcontroller. ( http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/list.php?id=3896 )
>
> But later I realized that there should be a single machine type for all
> Freescale Kinetis MCUs (K10 through K70), because those MCUs are
> software-compatible. I tried to rename "kinetis_k60" to just "kinetis"
> at the page mentioned above, but the names of the CONFIG_* macro and the
> identifier name did not change.
>
> I really do not want to register another machine type since it would be
> a mess having two machine types - one for Kinetis and another for
> Kinetis K60. Is it possible to change CONFIG_MACH_KINETIS_K60 to
> CONFIG_MACH_KINETIS and MACH_TYPE_KINETIS_K60 to MACH_TYPE_KINETIS in
> the database at http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ ?
I notice that you sent me a very similar email on 24th December, which I
haven't responded to yet: given that it's the Christmas period, and
people take holidays, I think you're being a little hasty over your
resending.
In any case, yes, I can change it. However, as has already been
pointed out, we're moving over to using device tree as the primary form
of platform differentiation. With device tree, machine type numbers
are completely meaningless (and aren't actually used by the kernel.)
While I will fix the entry, I suspect that Arnd will now refuse to
merge any new SoC support for mainline which is not using the device
tree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-03 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-28 9:51 Renaming MACH_TYPE_KINETIS_K60 into MACH_TYPE_KINETIS Alexander Potashev
2011-12-28 10:00 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-28 10:51 ` Alexander Potashev
2011-12-28 17:51 ` Marek Vasut
2012-01-01 15:51 ` Rob Herring
2012-01-03 11:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-01-03 11:21 ` Alexander Potashev
2012-01-03 15:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-03 16:10 ` Alexander Potashev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120103110337.GM2914@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).