[PATCH] ARM: imx6q: add support for IRAM

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 08:43:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:10:15AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Why is this even specific to fsl?  Isn't it something that could be
> > specified in a totally generic way?
> > 
> > As I showed with my original set of sram patches, there is not much
> > specific about this on-board RAM: what is specific is how a SoC uses
> > it, and that's up to the rest of the SoC code.
> > 
> As I have not seen any news/updates about the sram consolidation series
> since May, I did not bring up it here.  So what's the state of the
> series?  If it shows up on some stable branch, we would be happy to
> base the work here on it.

I have no idea; as I've already said, I lost total interest in it.

What I _am_ saying though is that rather than defining some platform
specific bindings and continuing that idiotic state of affairs, we
have the chance to do things properly now: define a standard set of
DT bindings to describe on-board SRAM.

That's something which can be done with or without the sram
consolidation stuff.